Literature DB >> 9401073

The significance of trisomy 8 in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia: the accompanying chromosome aberrations determine the prognosis. German AML Cooperative Study Group.

C Schoch1, D Haase, C Fonatsch, T Haferlach, H Löffler, B Schlegelberger, D K Hossfeld, R Becher, M C Sauerland, A Heinecke, B Wörmann, T Büchner, W Hiddemann.   

Abstract

Trisomy 8 is the most frequent numerical chromosome aberration in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). It occurs either as the sole anomaly or together with other clonal chromosome aberrations. We investigated whether accompanying chromosome anomalies influence the clinical outcome in patients with trisomy 8 and de novo AML. Since 1986, in 713 AML cases treated according to the protocols of the German AMLCG trials, chromosome analyses have been successfully performed. The overall incidence of trisomy 8 was 7.6%. Complete clinical follow-up data were available for 51 patients who were divided into three different categories: group 1: trisomy 8 as the sole cytogenetic anomaly (n = 20); group 2: trisomy 8 in addition to favourable chromosome aberrations (t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q21), inv(16)(p13q22)) (n = 10); and group 3: trisomy 8 accompanied by other anomalies, in most cases of complex type (n = 21). Complete remission (CR) rates were 70%, 90% and 67% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years differed significantly between patients with trisomy 8 only (37.5%), patients with trisomy 8 in combination with favourable aberrations (55.0%) and patients with trisomy 8 and other accompanying anomalies, mostly complex chromosome aberrations (9.0%) (group 1 v group 2: P=0.12; group 1 v group 3: P=0.005; group 2 v group 3: P=0.05). In this study patients with +8 as the sole cytogenetic anomaly had an intermediate prognosis, patients with +8 in addition to favourable chromosome aberrations maintained a good clinical outcome, and patients with +8 in combination with other abnormalities showed the worst prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9401073     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.4473257.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  5 in total

1.  Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and sole trisomies of chromosomes 4, 8, 11, 13 or 21.

Authors:  Bhavana Bhatnagar; Ann-Kathrin Eisfeld; Jessica Kohlschmidt; Krzysztof Mrózek; Deedra Nicolet; Dimitrios Papaioannou; Christopher J Walker; Shelley Orwick; James S Blachly; Jonathan E Kolitz; Bayard L Powell; Andrew J Carroll; Richard M Stone; John C Byrd; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Additional chromosome aberrations in acute promyelocytic leukemia: characteristics and prognostic influence.

Authors:  M Pantic; A Novak; D Marisavljevic; V Djordjevic; I Elezovic; A Vidovic; M Colovic
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Alexander Kohlmann; Susanne Schnittger; Benedikt Brors; Martin Dugas; Susanne Mergenthaler; Wolfgang Kern; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Roland Eils; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cytogenetic and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 mutation analyses in acute promyelocytic leukemia patients.

Authors:  Marjan Yaghmaie; Kamran Alimoghaddam; Hossein Mozdarani; Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh; Marjan Hajhashemi; Mozaffar Aznab; Seyed H Ghaffari
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2012

5.  Establishment and characterization of a novel childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, HXEX-ALL1, with chromosome 9p and 17p deletions.

Authors:  Yiping Zhu; Rong Yang; Ju Gao; Yanle Zhang; Ge Zhang; Ling Gu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 5.722

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.