Literature DB >> 9400430

A placebo controlled study of mycophenolate mofetil used in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids for the prevention of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients: 1-year results. The European Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Group.

M Wiesel1, S Carl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We performed a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 oral doses of mycophenolate mofetil with placebo for prevention of acute rejection episodes following first or second cadaveric renal allograft transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 491 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated to receive placebo (166), 1 gm. mycophenolate mofetil twice daily (165) or 1.5 gm. mycophenolate mofetil twice daily (160). Patients were given concomitant immunosuppression with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil was initiated within 72 hours of transplantation and was continued for at least 1 year.
RESULTS: The percentages of patients who experienced biopsy proved rejection or withdrew early from the trial for any reason were significantly reduced with 2 gm. (30.3%) and 3 gm. (38.8%) mycophenolate mofetil compared to placebo (56.0%) (p < 0.001). The biopsy proved rejection rates of the placebo, and 2 gm. and 3 gm. mycophenolate mofetil treatment arms were 46.4, 17.6 and 13.8%, respectively. There were fewer patients in the 2 gm. (28.5%) and 3 gm. (24.4%) mycophenolate mofetil groups compared to the placebo (51.8%) group, who received full courses of corticosteroids or antilymphocyte agents for treatment of rejection episodes in the first 6 months after renal transplantation. There was a greater incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events, leukopenia and opportunistic events in the mycophenolate mofetil treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolate mofetil was shown to reduce significantly the number of patients who experienced biopsy proved rejection episodes or treatment failure during the first year after renal transplantation, and was well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9400430     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64000-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  The emergence of mycophenolate mofetilin dermatology: from its roots in the world of organ transplantation to its versatile role in the dermatology treatment room.

Authors:  Hyunhee Park
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2011-01

Review 2.  Islet transplantation and encapsulation: an update on recent developments.

Authors:  Vijayaganapathy Vaithilingam; Bernard E Tuch
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2011-05-10

Review 3.  Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation.

Authors:  C J Dunn; A J Wagstaff; C M Perry; G L Plosker; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Immunosuppression for Lung Transplantation: Current and Future.

Authors:  Satish Chandrashekaran; Stacy A Crow Pharm; Sadia Z Shah; Chris J Arendt Pharm; Cassie C Kennedy
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2018-07-13

Review 5.  Mycophenolate mofetil: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Melissa Young; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Maciej Nowacki; Łukasz Nazarewski; Tomasz Kloskowski; Dominik Tyloch; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Katarzyna Pietkun; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Janusz Tyloch; Samy L Habib; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.318

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.