Literature DB >> 9399460

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute and subacute thrombosis with use of the Amplatz device: arterial and venous applications.

R Uflacker1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform a feasibility study of the Amplatz Thrombectomy Device (ATD) in a variety of vascular territories with acute or subacute thrombosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (mean age, 44.6 years) with multiple risk factors who had acute/subacute thrombosis of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and iliac veins (n = 3), superior vena cava (SVC) and/or subclavian veins (n = 3), lower extremity polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft (n = 2), iliac artery (n = 2), portal vein and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) (n = 2), and an IVC to pulmonary artery Fontan conduit (n = 1), were treated by means of mechanical thrombectomy with use of the ATD. Thrombolysis failed to recanalize the vessels when used before thrombectomy for 12-34 hours in three patients, and was contraindicated in three other patients. Thrombolysis was used as a complement to the ATD procedure in five patients.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 11 patients, and procedure success was achieved in 10 patients. Failure was observed in the remaining three patients. One patient with a PTFE graft was successfully declotted but thrombosis occurred 2 weeks later, requiring surgery. The other patient with a PTFE graft did not improve and needed surgery to declot and treat the distal anastomosis and distal circulation. The two patients with an occluded iliac artery underwent successful declotting but rethrombosis occurred in one shortly after the procedure requiring thrombolytic therapy. One patient with TIPS thrombosis improved and another patient with a thrombosed portal vein did not improve after thrombectomy.
CONCLUSION: The ATD is useful for recanalization of acute/subacute clotted native vessels and grafts. The application of the device is broad, and although declotting can be achieved in most cases, long-term success may be limited by anatomical and technical problems of the grafts and multifactorial clinical problems of severely sick patients, as was the case in the series. The use of additional thrombolytic therapy may be necessary in a number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9399460     DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70688-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  5 in total

1.  Thrombosed dialysis access grafts: randomized comparison of the Amplatz thrombectomy device and surgical thromboembolectomy.

Authors:  Renan Uflacker; P R Rajagopalan; J Bayne Selby; Christopher Hannegan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Percutaneous options for acute deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Clay Padginton
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Guidance for the use of thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Suresh Vedantham; Gregory Piazza; Akhilesh K Sista; Neil A Goldenberg
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Multimodal sequential treatment for occluded TIPS: Case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Nicoletta De Matthaeis; Carmine Di Stasi; Fabrizio Pizzolante; Riccardo Manfredi; Gian Ludovico Rapaccini; Luca Miele
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2019-11-18

Review 5.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: Korean Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Seung-Kee Min; Young Hwan Kim; Jin Hyun Joh; Jin Mo Kang; Ui Jun Park; Hyung-Kee Kim; Jeong-Hwan Chang; Sang Jun Park; Jang Yong Kim; Jae Ik Bae; Sun Young Choi; Chang Won Kim; Sung Il Park; Nam Yeol Yim; Yong Sun Jeon; Hyun-Ki Yoon; Ki Hyuk Park
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2016-09-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.