Literature DB >> 9398370

Species-specific footdrumming in kangaroo rats: Dipodomys ingens, D. deserti, D. spectabilis

.   

Abstract

Footdrumming was compared in three allopatric species of kangaroo rat, Dipodomysfrom three habitats. Analysis of footdrumming recordings revealed species-specific patterns of drumming ranging from single thumps to individual footdrumming signatures. The desert kangaroo rat, D. desertidrums single thumps spaced 0.25-0.30 s apart that are sometimes introduced with a short footroll. The giant kangaroo rat, D. ingensdrums long footrolls that can average over 100 drums at 18 drums/s. The banner-tailed kangaroo rat, D. spectabilisdrums three to 38 footdrums in a footroll combined into sequences of two to 12 footrolls at a rate of 17 drums/s. In playback tests, all three species stood in alert postures and entered the burrow in response to footdrumming of their own and the other species. The rats also responded in species-specific ways. Dipodomys spectabilisdrummed to its own species' footdrumming, but not to playbacks of the single drums of D. desertiInstead of footdrumming to playbacks of its own species, D. deserti approached the speaker more frequently than did either of the other two species. Dipodomys ingens footdrummed equally to all footdrumming playbacks. The species' differences reflect differences in social tolerance and spacing. Dipodomys deserti rarely engages in footdrumming exchanges and chases visitors from the burrow. Dipodomys spectabilis engages in frequent footdrumming exchanges and some chases, and D. ingens seems to tolerate close neighbours and footdrums periodically.Copyright 1997 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour1997The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398370     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  6 in total

Review 1.  How do animals use substrate-borne vibrations as an information source?

Authors:  Peggy S M Hill
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-07-11

Review 2.  Acoustic sequences in non-human animals: a tutorial review and prospectus.

Authors:  Arik Kershenbaum; Daniel T Blumstein; Marie A Roch; Çağlar Akçay; Gregory Backus; Mark A Bee; Kirsten Bohn; Yan Cao; Gerald Carter; Cristiane Cäsar; Michael Coen; Stacy L DeRuiter; Laurance Doyle; Shimon Edelman; Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho; Todd M Freeberg; Ellen C Garland; Morgan Gustison; Heidi E Harley; Chloé Huetz; Melissa Hughes; Julia Hyland Bruno; Amiyaal Ilany; Dezhe Z Jin; Michael Johnson; Chenghui Ju; Jeremy Karnowski; Bernard Lohr; Marta B Manser; Brenda McCowan; Eduardo Mercado; Peter M Narins; Alex Piel; Megan Rice; Roberta Salmi; Kazutoshi Sasahara; Laela Sayigh; Yu Shiu; Charles Taylor; Edgar E Vallejo; Sara Waller; Veronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-11-26

3.  Proposing a neural framework for the evolution of elaborate courtship displays.

Authors:  Ryan W Schwark; Matthew J Fuxjager; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in two species of kangaroo rats: implications for auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  L A Shaffer; G R Long
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Laryngeal airway reconstruction indicates that rodent ultrasonic vocalizations are produced by an edge-tone mechanism.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Heather L Borgard; Bret Pasch
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Divergent behavior amid convergent evolution: A case of four desert rodents learning to respond to known and novel vipers.

Authors:  Sonny Shlomo Bleicher; Burt P Kotler; Omri Shalev; Austin Dixon; Keren Embar; Joel S Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.