Literature DB >> 9398318

Identification of acetylcholine receptor channel-lining residues in the M1 segment of the beta-subunit.

H Zhang1, A Karlin.   

Abstract

The substituted cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) was applied to the first membrane-spanning segment (M1) of the mouse-muscle acetylcholine (ACh) receptor beta subunit. One at a time, each residue from betaR219 to betaP247, except betaC233, was mutated to Cys, and the mutant beta subunits were expressed together with wild-type alpha, gamma, and delta in Xenopus oocytes. All 28 mutants yielded functional receptors. The accessibility of the substituted Cys to the methanethiosulfonate (MTS) derivatives, MTS ethylammonium (MTSEA), MTS ethyltrimethylammonium (MTSET), and MTS ethylsulfonate (MTSES), added extracellularly in the absence or the presence of ACh, was inferred from their irreversible effects on ACh-induced current. Three consecutive residues close to the extracellular end of M1, betaF224C, betaY225C, and betaL226C, reacted both in the absence and presence of ACh, and one deeper residue, betaV229C reacted only in the presence of ACh. betaV229C also reacted with 2-aminoethyl-2-aminoethanethiosulfonate (AEAETS) and with 2-hydroxyethyl MTS (MTSEH). The rate constants for the reactions of betaV229C with MTSEA, which permeates the open channel, and with MTSEH, which is uncharged, were independent of membrane potential. The rate constant for the reaction of the doubly positively charged AEAETS, however, was dependent on membrane potential, consistent with the exposure of betaV229C in the open channel. The N-terminal third of betaM1, like that of alphaM1, contributes to the lining of the channel and undergoes structural changes during gating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398318     DOI: 10.1021/bi972357u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  30 in total

1.  Voltage clamp fluorometric measurements on a type II Na+-coupled Pi cotransporter: shedding light on substrate binding order.

Authors:  Leila V Virkki; Heini Murer; Ian C Forster
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  A model of the closed form of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor m2 channel pore.

Authors:  Sanguk Kim; Aaron K Chamberlain; James U Bowie
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Molecular investigations on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: conformational mapping and dynamic exploration using photoaffinity labeling.

Authors:  F Kotzyba-Hibert; T Grutter; M Goeldner
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Normal mode analysis suggests a quaternary twist model for the nicotinic receptor gating mechanism.

Authors:  Antoine Taly; Marc Delarue; Thomas Grutter; Michael Nilges; Nicolas Le Novère; Pierre-Jean Corringer; Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Opened by a twist: a gating mechanism for the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Antoine Taly
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 1.733

6.  Structural effects of quinacrine binding in the open channel of the acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Yong Yu; Lei Shi; Arthur Karlin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Implications of the quaternary twist allosteric model for the physiology and pathology of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Authors:  Antoine Taly; Pierre-Jean Corringer; Thomas Grutter; Lia Prado de Carvalho; Martin Karplus; Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Non-equivalent ligand selectivity of agonist sites in (α4β2)2α4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: a key determinant of agonist efficacy.

Authors:  Simone Mazzaferro; Federica Gasparri; Karina New; Constanza Alcaino; Manuel Faundez; Patricio Iturriaga Vasquez; Ranjit Vijayan; Philip C Biggin; Isabel Bermudez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Modeling noncompetitive antagonism of a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.

Authors:  Denis B Tikhonov; Ian R Mellor; Peter N R Usherwood
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  SCAM analysis of Panx1 suggests a peculiar pore structure.

Authors:  Junjie Wang; Gerhard Dahl
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.