Literature DB >> 9397251

White-coat resistant hypertension.

A Mezzetti1, S D Pierdomenico, F Costantini, F Romano, A Bucci, M Di Gioacchino, F Cuccurullo.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sustained hypertensives with high clinic blood pressure, despite multiple drug treatment, show a true resistant hypertension or a "white-coat effect," and whether the pretreatment white-coat effect is maintained despite pharmacological therapy. The occurrence of resistant hypertension was determined in 250 consecutive essential hypertensives who had had an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring before treatment assignment. Twenty-seven of 250 hypertensives with persistently high clinic blood pressure despite 3 months of adequate pharmacological therapy underwent further ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Using our internal standards, seven patients had a true resistant hypertension whereas 20 subjects showed a large white-coat effect (white-coat resistant hypertension), ie, high clinic blood pressure (> 140/90) but "normal" ambulatory daytime (< 139/90 mm Hg) and 24 h (135/85 mm Hg) blood pressure. Using other cutoff points for ambulatory blood pressure, 134/90 and 135/85 mm Hg for daytime blood pressure, 10 and 13 patients, respectively, were reclassified as true resistant hypertensives and 17 and 14, respectively, were white-coat resistant hypertensives. Interestingly, in white-coat resistant hypertensives the large differences between clinic and ambulatory daytime blood pressure (white-coat effect), recorded before treatment assignment, were not affected by drugs and remained constant over time. Left ventricular mass index in white-coat resistant hypertensives was significantly lower than in truly resistant hypertensives, suggesting that prognosis could differ between these groups. In this study, using either our internal standards or some other cutoffs reported in the literature, the white-coat phenomenon was an important cause of resistant hypertension. The use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in these patients may avoid misdiagnosis of resistant hypertension, unnecessary overtreatment, and expensive procedures to look for possible secondary hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9397251     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00318-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  5 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Management of Resistant Hypertension: Still a Matter of our Resistance?

Authors:  Antonios A Lazaridis; Pantelis A Sarafidis; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Ambulatory blood pressure improves prediction of cardiovascular risk: implications for better antihypertensive management.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Around-the-clock ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is required to properly diagnose resistant hypertension and assess associated vascular risk.

Authors:  Ramón C Hermida; Diana E Ayala; María T Ríos; José R Fernández; Artemio Mojón; Michael H Smolensky
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Prognostic Importance of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Resistant Hypertension: Is It All that Matters?

Authors:  Claudia R L Cardoso; Gil F Salles
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  [Epidemiology and etiology of therapy-resistant hypertension].

Authors:  C Schirpenbach; M Reincke
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 0.743

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.