Literature DB >> 9396904

Should the same glucose values be targeted for type 1 as for type 2 diabetics in pregnancy?

D A Sacks1, W Chen, J S Greenspoon, G Wolde-Tsadik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether the same maternal glycemic control is necessary to achieve similar perinatal outcomes for type 1 as for type 2 diabetics. STUDY
DESIGN: The subjects were all women with pregestational diabetes mellitus delivered of live-born singletons. Glycemic control was achieved with diet and insulin. Self-monitoring of blood glucose was performed before meals and at bedtime. Target glucose values were 60 to 90 mg/dl fasting and 60 to 105 mg/dl at other times.
RESULTS: Of 60,628 deliveries, 46 type 1 and 113 type 2 diabetic women met inclusion criteria. Respective differences were found between type 1 and type 2 diabetics in average daily glucose levels (112 mg/dl vs 97 mg/dl, p < 0.001), percent of values within target ranges (35% vs 57%, p < 0.001), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (48.1 mg/dl vs 24.9 mg/dl, p < 0.001). At least one daily glucose value was < 50 mg/dl during 19% of observation days for type 1 vs 2% of observation days for type 2 pregnancies (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between type 1 and type 2 diabetic pregnancies in neonatal macrosomia (30% vs 34%), proportion of cesarean deliveries during labor for arrest disorders (67% vs 69%), shoulder dystocia (2% vs 6%), and neonatal hypoglycemia (18% vs 26%).
CONCLUSIONS: Less stringent maternal glycemic control may permit comparable maternal and neonatal outcomes for type 1 compared with type 2 diabetics. Higher target values for type 1 diabetics may decrease the frequency of maternal hypoglycemic episodes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9396904     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70025-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Glycemic targets in pregnancies affected by diabetes: historical perspective and future directions.

Authors:  Teri L Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Caroline A Crowther; Lucy Simmonds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-04

3.  Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: population based study.

Authors:  Mary C M Macintosh; Kate M Fleming; Jaron A Bailey; Pat Doyle; Jo Modder; Dominique Acolet; Shona Golightly; Alison Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-16

Review 4.  Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Caroline A Crowther; Lucy Simmonds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 5.  Development of early-onset type 2 diabetes in the young: implications for child bearing.

Authors:  Carol J Homko; E Albert Reece
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  The effect of maternal body mass index on perinatal outcomes in women with diabetes.

Authors:  Nicole E Marshall; Camelia Guild; Yvonne W Cheng; Aaron B Caughey; Donna R Halloran
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.