Literature DB >> 9396883

Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group.

B M Sibai1, M Ewell, R J Levine, M A Klebanoff, J Esterlitz, P M Catalano, R L Goldenberg, G Joffe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to identify risk factors for the development of preeclampsia in nulliparous women enrolled in a multicenter trial comparing calcium supplementation to a placebo. STUDY
DESIGN: A total of 4589 women from five centers was studied. Analysis of risk factors for preeclampsia was performed in 4314 who carried the pregnancy to > 20 weeks. Baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure, demographic characteristics, and findings after randomization were examined for the prediction of preeclampsia. Preeclampsia was defined as hypertension (diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg on two occasions 4 hours to 1 week apart) and proteinuria (> or = 300 mg/24 hours, a protein/creatinine ratio > or = 0.35, one dipstick measurement > or = 2+ or two dipstick measurements > or = 1+ at an interval as specified for diastolic blood pressure).
RESULTS: Preeclampsia developed in 326 women (7.6%). The first analysis treated each risk factor as a categoric variable in a univariate regression. Maternal age, blood group and Rh factor, alcohol use, previous abortion or miscarriage, private insurance, and calcium supplementation were not statistically significant. Risk factors initially found to be significant were body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, non-white race (African-American and other), clinical center, and smoking. Adjusted odds ratios computed with a logistic regression model revealed that body mass index (odds ratio 3.22 for > or = 35 kg/m2 vs < 19.8 kg/m2), systolic blood pressure (odds ratio 2.66 for > or = 120 vs < 101 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure (odds ratio 1.72 for > or = 61 mm Hg vs < 60 mm Hg), and clinical center (odds ratio 1.85 for Memphis vs the other clinical centers) were statistically significant predictors of preeclampsia. Results of the final model fit revealed that preeclampsia risk increases significantly (p < 0.0001) with increased body mass index at randomization, as well as with increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure at randomization. Calcium supplementation had no effect on the risks posed by body mass index and blood pressure. Among risk factors developing after randomization, an abnormal results of a glucose screen (plasma glucose > or = 140 mg/dl 1 hour after a 50 gm glucose challenge) was not found to be associated with a significant risk of preeclampsia.
CONCLUSION: These risk factors should be of value in counseling women regarding preeclampsia and should aid in understanding the pathophysiologic characteristics of this syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9396883     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70004-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  106 in total

Review 1.  Preeclampsia, an implantation disorder.

Authors:  Leslie L Waite; Amy K Atwood; Robert N Taylor
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and maternal biologic markers of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Jacques Massé; Yves Giguère; Abdelaziz Kharfi; Joël Girouard; Jean-Claude Forest
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Neutrophil release of myeloperoxidase in systemic vasculature of obese women may put them at risk for preeclampsia.

Authors:  Juhi Shukla; Scott W Walsh
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Trophoblast differentiation during embryo implantation and formation of the maternal-fetal interface.

Authors:  Kristy Red-Horse; Yan Zhou; Olga Genbacev; Akraporn Prakobphol; Russell Foulk; Michael McMaster; Susan J Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Recent insights into the pathophysiology of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Eric M George; Joey P Granger
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-09-01

6.  Unexplained fetal death: another anti-angiogenic state.

Authors:  Jimmy Espinoza; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Yeon Mee Kim; Gi Jin Kim; Jyh Kae Nien; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Emmanuel Bujold; Luis F Gonçalves; Ricardo Gomez; Samuel Edwin
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2007-07

Review 7.  Animal models of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Eduardo Podjarny; Gyorgy Losonczy; Chris Baylis
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.299

8.  Circulating Vascular Growth Factor (VEGF) Angiopoietin-1 (Angi-1) and Soluble Tie-2 Receptor in Pregnancy Complicated with Pre-eclampsia: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Salah Aref; Hosam Goda; Ebrahim Abdelaal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-05-11

9.  Preeclampsia and pregnancies with small-for-gestational age neonates have different profiles of complement split products.

Authors:  Eleazar Soto; Roberto Romero; Karina Richani; Jimmy Espinoza; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Jyh Kae Nien; Sam S Edwin; Yeon Mee Kim; Joon Seok Hong; Luis F Goncalves; Lami Yeo; Moshe Mazor; Sonia S Hassan; Juan Pedro Kusanovic
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-07

10.  Could alterations in maternal plasma visfatin concentration participate in the phenotype definition of preeclampsia and SGA?

Authors:  Shali Mazaki-Tovi; Roberto Romero; Sun Kwon Kim; Edi Vaisbuch; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Offer Erez; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Francesca Gotsch; Pooja Mittal; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Nandor Gabor Than; Ricardo Gomez; Jyh Kae Nien; Samuel S Edwin; Percy Pacora; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2010-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.