PURPOSE: NB87 was designed to test the efficacy of a short, non cross-resistant, induction protocol for unselected patients over 1 year of age with stage 4 neuroblastoma. A secondary objective was to compare in a randomized study the toxicity of two modalities of cisplatin administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 183 patients received two cycles of alternating sequences: cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5, vincristine 1.5 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 5, and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2/d on day 5 (CADO); and cisplatin 40 mg/m2/d and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 (CVP), followed by surgery of the primary tumor (126 patients). Ninety-one were randomized to receive cisplatin either as bolus (BO; n = 48) or continuous infusion (CI; n = 43). International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and Response Criteria (INRC) were used with emphasis on skeletal evaluation by meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). RESULTS:Hematotoxicity was predominant, with a higher incidence of neutropenia (P = .01) for CADO and of thrombocytopenia for CVP (P < .001). Severe infections, as well as nonhematologic toxicities, occurred more often after the first sequence. Gastrointestinal complications were predominant during both courses of CVP. The toxic death rate, including surgery, was 3%. Complete remissions (CRs) were less frequent on MIBG (45%) compared with marrow (66%) or other metastases (61%). Combining all metastatic sites resulted in a 39% CR rate. After surgery, the final CR rate was 42%. Nephrotoxicity was minimal in both arms (92% normal clearance for CI v 82% for BO). Hearing loss greater than 40 dB at 6,000 to 8,000 Hz was reported equally in both arms (n = 6 for CI v n = 5 for BO). CONCLUSION: Intensified chemotherapy using CADO/CVP increases CR rates despite a shorter induction duration. However, the rate of MIBG normalization remains unsatisfactory and could be raised through the dose-intensive use of agents such as cyclophosphamide.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: NB87 was designed to test the efficacy of a short, non cross-resistant, induction protocol for unselected patients over 1 year of age with stage 4 neuroblastoma. A secondary objective was to compare in a randomized study the toxicity of two modalities of cisplatin administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 183 patients received two cycles of alternating sequences: cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5, vincristine 1.5 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 5, and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2/d on day 5 (CADO); and cisplatin 40 mg/m2/d and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 5 (CVP), followed by surgery of the primary tumor (126 patients). Ninety-one were randomized to receive cisplatin either as bolus (BO; n = 48) or continuous infusion (CI; n = 43). International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and Response Criteria (INRC) were used with emphasis on skeletal evaluation by meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG). RESULTS: Hematotoxicity was predominant, with a higher incidence of neutropenia (P = .01) for CADO and of thrombocytopenia for CVP (P < .001). Severe infections, as well as nonhematologic toxicities, occurred more often after the first sequence. Gastrointestinal complications were predominant during both courses of CVP. The toxic death rate, including surgery, was 3%. Complete remissions (CRs) were less frequent on MIBG (45%) compared with marrow (66%) or other metastases (61%). Combining all metastatic sites resulted in a 39% CR rate. After surgery, the final CR rate was 42%. Nephrotoxicity was minimal in both arms (92% normal clearance for CI v 82% for BO). Hearing loss greater than 40 dB at 6,000 to 8,000 Hz was reported equally in both arms (n = 6 for CI v n = 5 for BO). CONCLUSION: Intensified chemotherapy using CADO/CVP increases CR rates despite a shorter induction duration. However, the rate of MIBG normalization remains unsatisfactory and could be raised through the dose-intensive use of agents such as cyclophosphamide.
Authors: S Proust-Houdemont; C Pasqualini; P Blanchard; C Dufour; E Benhamou; G Goma; M Semeraro; M-A Raquin; O Hartmann; D Valteau-Couanet Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: David R Freyer; Penelope R Brock; Kay W Chang; L Lee Dupuis; Sidnei Epelman; Kristin Knight; Denise Mills; Robert Phillips; Emma Potter; Demie Risby; Philippa Simpkin; Michael Sullivan; Sandra Cabral; Paula D Robinson; Lillian Sung Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Esmee Cm Kooijmans; Arend Bökenkamp; Nic S Tjahjadi; Jesse M Tettero; Eline van Dulmen-den Broeder; Helena Jh van der Pal; Margreet A Veening Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-03-11
Authors: V Minard; O Hartmann; M C Peyroulet; J Michon; C Coze; A S Defachelle; O Lejars; Y Perel; C Bergeron; P Boutard; G Leverger; J L Stephan; A Thyss; P Chastagner; G Couillault; C Devalck; P Lutz; F Mechinaud; F Millot; D Plantaz; X Rialland; H Rubie Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 7.640