Literature DB >> 9395630

The health beliefs and behaviors of three groups of complementary medicine and a general practice group of patients.

A Furnham1, C Vincent, R Wood.   

Abstract

Patients (n = 256), consulting either a general practitioner (GP) or one of three complementary practitioners (osteopath, homeopath, or acupuncturist), completed a seven-part questionnaire that looked at demographic data, medical history, familiarization with complementary therapies, health beliefs and life-style, health locus of control, scientific health beliefs, and their perceptions of the consultation style of general and complementary practitioners. The four subject groups did not differ significantly on the demographic variables of sex, years of schooling, whether or not they had a degree, marital status, or income, but did differ on age and number of children. The effects of both the significant demographic variables and some aspects of patients medical history were controlled for in subsequent analyses. Acupuncture patients stood out as having the most different chronic medical history. They were also least satisfied with their GP, had least confidence in prescribed drugs, and were most concerned with leading a healthy life-style. The acupuncture patients were most skeptical about orthodox medicine. The main finding was that patients of complementary practitioners are not a homogeneous group, but do differ in their views on satisfaction with GPs, healthy life-style, global environmental issues, confidence in prescribed drugs, faith in medical science, importance of a "healthy mind," harmful effects of medical science, and scientific methodology. The results imply that patients consult different practitioners, general or alternative, on the basis of a combination of their level of skepticism about orthodox medicine, their life-style, and other health beliefs. To talk of patients of complementary practitioners as a homogeneous group is fundamentally wrong.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9395630     DOI: 10.1089/acm.1995.1.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Altern Complement Med        ISSN: 1075-5535            Impact factor:   2.579


  10 in total

Review 1.  Quality, efficacy and safety of complementary medicines: fashions, facts and the future. Part I. Regulation and quality.

Authors:  Joanne Barnes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Content and Perceived Utility of Mental Imagery by Older Adults in a Peer-Delivered Physical Activity Intervention.

Authors:  P R Giacobbi; M P Buman; J Dzierzewski; A T Aiken-Morgan; B Roberts; M Marsiske; N Knutson; C Smith-McCrae
Journal:  J Appl Sport Psychol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.585

3.  Longitudinal use of complementary and alternative medicine among older adults with radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Shibing Yang; Catherine E Dubé; Charles B Eaton; Timothy E McAlindon; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.393

4.  Guided imagery targeting exercise, food cravings, and stress: a multi-modal randomized feasibility trial.

Authors:  Peter Giacobbi; Dustin Long; Richard Nolan; Samantha Shawley; Kelsey Johnson; Ranjita Misra
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-08-01

5.  'This diarrhoea is not a disease …' local illness concepts and their effects on mothers' health seeking behaviour: a qualitative study, Shuhair, Yemen.

Authors:  Hana H Webair; Abdulla S Bin Ghouth
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Homeopathy satisfaction in Iran.

Authors:  Ahmad Mahmoudian; Gholamhosein Sadri
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-09

7.  Health Behavior Change and Complementary Medicine Use: National Health Interview Survey 2012.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Romy Lauche; Holger Cramer; Jonquil W Pinto; Brenda Leung; Helen Hall; Matthew Leach; Vincent Ch Chung; Tobias Sundberg; Yan Zhang; Amie Steel; Lesley Ward; David Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 8.  Factors associated with self-care activities among adults in the United Kingdom: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela Ryan; Sue Wilson; Aliki Taylor; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Popularity and customer preferences for over-the-counter Chinese medicines perceived by community pharmacists in Shanghai and Guangzhou: a questionnaire survey study.

Authors:  Shuai Ge; Tian-Tian He; Hao Hu
Journal:  Chin Med       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 5.455

Review 10.  Against all odds-the persistent popularity of homeopathy.

Authors:  Cemre Cukaci; Michael Freissmuth; Christopher Mann; Joshua Marti; Veronika Sperl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.704

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.