Literature DB >> 9395560

Ethnicity and use of obstetrical analgesia: do Pakistani women receive inadequate pain relief in labour?

S Vangen1, C Stoltenberg, B Schei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether the use of analgesic treatment in labour is influenced by ethnicity.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of hospital patients. Setting; the two municipal hospitals, Ullevål and Aker, in Oslo, Norway. Subjects; a total of 137 obstetrical patients, 67 Pakistani women and 70 Norwegian women. Main outcome measure; use of analgesics in labour.
RESULTS: 30% of the Pakistani and 9% of the Norwegian women received no analgesia in labour. Pethidine injection was the preferred analgesic administered to Pakistani women. Women of Pakistani origin received epidural infusion or nitrous oxide and oxygen gas less frequently than Norwegian women. They also received fewer combinations of other analgesic methods. When adjusted for the mothers' age, parity and duration of delivery, Pakistani origin was the only significant predictor for receiving no analgesia in labour.
CONCLUSION: Women of Pakistani origin were more than three times as likely not to receive analgesia in labour as Norwegian women. The health services offered to Pakistani women in labour were different from those offered to Norwegian women. These results indicate that women of Pakistani origin may be offered insufficient obstetrical analgesia, or that Norwegian women received unnecessary pain relief in labour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9395560     DOI: 10.1080/13557858.1996.9961783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Health        ISSN: 1355-7858            Impact factor:   2.772


  7 in total

1.  Obstetric Outcomes of First- and Second-Generation Pakistani Immigrants: A Comparison Study at a Low-Risk Maternity Ward in Norway.

Authors:  Kjersti S Bakken; Ola H Skjeldal; Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2017-02

2.  Pain relief in labor: a survey of awareness, attitude, and practice of health care providers in Zaria, Nigeria.

Authors:  E Ogboli-Nwasor; Se Adaji; Sb Bature; Os Shittu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Effects of epidural lidocaine analgesia on labor and delivery: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial.

Authors:  Shahram Nafisi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  The provision of epidural analgesia during labor according to maternal birthplace: a Norwegian register study.

Authors:  Åsa Henning Waldum; Anne Flem Jacobsen; Mirjam Lukasse; Anne Cathrine Staff; Ragnhild Sørum Falk; Siri Vangen; Ingvil Krarup Sørbye
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Allophone immigrant women's knowledge and perceptions of epidural analgesia for labour pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Melissa Dominicé Dao; Désirée Gerosa; Iris Pélieu; Guy Haller
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 6.  International migration and caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Merry; Rhonda Small; Béatrice Blondel; Anita J Gagnon
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Haiyan Gao; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.