Literature DB >> 9395439

The Health Utility Index: measuring health differences in Ontario by socioeconomic status.

R Roberge1, J M Berthelot, M Wolfson.   

Abstract

The positive relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and longevity has long been established. Comparable evidence exists for SES and morbidity, but observations of this relationship tend to be limited to specific health indicators. In this article, a comprehensive quantitative measure of health status, the Health Utility Index (HUI), is applied to an analysis of the relationship between SES and the health status of people aged 25 and over in Ontario. The HUI, based on a set of questions included in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey (OHS), provides a summary index of the health of each respondent. The OHS data show that lower levels of education, income, and occupation are associated with lower HUI values. Health status differences across SES groups are greater in late middle-age than at younger or older ages, a pattern consistent with the findings of other studies. The development of summary indicators like the HUI is part of a larger effort to construct measures for monitoring the health of Canadians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9395439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Rep        ISSN: 0840-6529            Impact factor:   4.796


  7 in total

Review 1.  Health-related quality of life and regulatory issues in the US and Canada.

Authors:  Judith Glennie
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Access to care, health status, and health disparities in the United States and Canada: results of a cross-national population-based survey.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Socioeconomic status and age variations in health-related quality of life: results from the national health measurement study.

Authors:  Stephanie A Robert; Dasha Cherepanov; Mari Palta; Nancy Cross Dunham; David Feeny; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population.

Authors:  N Mittmann; K Trakas; N Risebrough; B A Liu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Predicting health preference in chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Nicole Mittmann; Sander L Hitzig; B Catharine Craven
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Comprehensibility of measures of health-related quality of life in minority and low-income patients.

Authors:  Erica I Lubetkin; Marthe R Gold
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Health and wealth in children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease (K-CAD study).

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Meredith Medway; Madeleine Didsbury; Allison Tong; Robin Turner; Fiona Mackie; Steven McTaggart; Amanda Walker; Sarah White; Kirsten Howard; Siah Kim; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.