Literature DB >> 939541

Reproducibility of the mitosis count in the histologic diagnosis of smooth muscle tumors of the uterus.

S G Silverberg.   

Abstract

In order to ascertain the reproducibility of the mitosis count in histologic tumor diagnosis, a reference set of 10 microscopic slides from smooth muscle tumors of the uterus was shown to six different pathologists, who were asked to record the number of mitotic figures per 10 high power fields in the most active region of each slide. The results, when tubulated, revealed considerable observer variation in this supposedly objective and quantitative diagnostic criterion. The diagnosis of benignity or malignancy, based on this criterion alone, were unamimous in only four of the 10 cases, whereas the diagnoses based on a constellation of histologic criteria were unanimous in all cases and correlated well with the subsequent clinical evolution of those cases with follow-up data. Possible reasons for the lack of reproducibility of the mitosis count are discussed. We conclude that a qualitative estimation of mitotic activity is helpful as one of the diagnostic and prognostic criteria in the assessment of uterine and other smooth muscle tumors, but that it cannot be used as the sole criterion for distinguishing benign from malignant tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 939541     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(76)80058-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of Ki-67 equivalent antibodies.

Authors:  C F Lindboe; S H Torp
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  How malignant is malignant? A brief review of the microscopic assessment of human neoplasms, and the prediction of whether they will metastasize and kill.

Authors:  I Carr; N Pettigrew
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Which proliferation markers for routine immunohistology? A comparison of five antibodies.

Authors:  D S Rose; P H Maddox; D C Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Mitotic indexes as prognostic predictors in female breast cancer.

Authors:  S Aaltomaa; P Lipponen; M Eskelinen; V M Kosma; S Marin; E Alhava; K Syrjänen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Review: assessment of cell proliferation in histological material.

Authors:  P A Hall; D A Levison
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Does delay in fixation affect the number of mitotic figures in processed tissue?

Authors:  S S Cross; R D Start; J H Smith
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Kyuichi Kadota; Kei Suzuki; Christos Colovos; Camelia S Sima; Valerie W Rusch; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and S phase fraction in endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Authors:  J B Schofield; J Mansi; R S Camplejohn; D P Lane; C Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Comparison of proliferation rates assessed using "multiblock" and conventional tissue blocks of lung carcinoma.

Authors:  D C Brown; K C Gatter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  A rapid and simple staining method, using toluidine blue, for analysing mitotic figures in tissue sections.

Authors:  P Chieco; M Pagnoni; E Romagnoli; C Melchiorri
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1993-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.