What other regimens are under investigation to treat Helicobacter pylori infection?

The most common infection in the world, Helicobacter pylori infection, is very specific, and present experience in treating infectious diseases is not applicable in general for this infection. Animal models (e.g., mouse and ferret) are thus far inadequate as reliable screening models. Old-fashioned trial-and-error treatment of infected humans is still the screening model and the gold standard in the evaluation of regimens aimed at eradication of H. pylori. A variety of studies on treatment of H. pylori infection have been performed with varying results. This pooled analysis of the following therapeutic combinations: proton pump inhibitor (PPI) plus two antibiotics or antimicrobials, quadruple therapies, and nonantibiotic regimens is an attempt to make a fair comparison of tested therapeutic strategies aimed at eradicating H. pylori. Data from treatment groups including specified drug combinations are pooled, regardless of dose or duration. Search methods are: MEDLINE 1984-1996, Digestive Disease Week 1988-1996, United European Gastroenterology Week 1992-1996, European Helicobacter pylori Study Group 1988-1996, Asia Pacific Congress 1996, H. pylori International Workshop Hong Kong 1996, and miscellaneous. Eradication rates (efficacy) are presented as intention-to-treat data (i.e., worst-case analysis). Separate subanalyses with regard to study quality, dose, and duration are performed for some groups. A general cost-efficacy analysis is performed based on pooled efficacy data. Convenience data are presented as total number of tablets, total number of intake occasions, and duration of therapy. Drugs evaluated in the analysis are bismuthdicitrate, tetracycline, amoxicillin, nitroimidazoles, macrolides, H2-receptor antagonists, PPIs, sucralfate, and sofalcone. The most effective and convenient drug combinations are the PPI-based triple therapies. No significant difference was observed between the three PPIs. The cure rate did not improve after addition of bismuth. Cost-effectiveness is closely associated with efficacy.