Literature DB >> 9393425

Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants.

R S Truhlar1, I H Orenstein, H F Morris, S Ochi.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the distribution of bone quality in the various jaw regions assists the clinician in dental implant treatment planning. Bone quality was assessed with radiographs and tactile sensation for 2,839 implants at the time of placement into four anatomic regions of the jaw. The Lekholm-Zarb classification system was used. Overall, bone quality types 1 and 4 were found much less frequently than types 2 and 3. Although variations in density existed in each region, quality 2 bone dominated the mandible, and quality 3 bone was more prevalent in the maxilla. For both anterior and posterior jaw regions, types 2 and 3 bone predominated. The anterior mandible had the densest bone, followed by the posterior mandible, anterior maxilla, and posterior maxilla.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9393425     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(16)31196-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  15 in total

1.  Piezosurgery-assisted, flapless split crest surgery for implant site preparation.

Authors:  Federico Brugnami; Alfonso Caiazzo; Pushkar Mehra
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-05-16

2.  Rationale for tilted implants: FEA considerations and clinical reports.

Authors:  G DE Vico; M Bonino; D Spinelli; R Schiavetti; G Sannino; A Pozzi; L Ottria
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2012-04-15

3.  Modified osteotome sinus floor elevation using combination platelet rich fibrin, bone graft materials, and immediate implant placement in the posterior maxilla.

Authors:  Sumit Narang; Anuj Singh Parihar; Anu Narang; Sachit Arora; Vartika Katoch; Vineet Bhatia
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

4.  A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination.

Authors:  Marthinus J Kotze; Kurt-W Bütow; Steve A Olorunju; Harry F Kotze
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Cumulative survival rate and associated risk factors of Implantium implants: A 10-year retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Jin-Hong Park; Young-Soo Kim; Jae-Jun Ryu; Sang-Wan Shin; Jeong-Yol Lee
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 1.904

6.  Er:YAG laser, piezosurgery, and surgical drill for bone decortication during orthodontic mini-implant insertion: primary stability analysis-an animal study.

Authors:  Jacek Matys; Rafał Flieger; Gianluca Tenore; Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Umberto Romeo; Marzena Dominiak
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  The effect of pulp inflammation and premature extraction of primary molars on the successor permanent teeth. A retrospective study.

Authors:  Fawn Nitanee van der Weijden; Daniela Hesse; Gabriela Caldeira Andrade Americano; Vera Mendes Soviero; Clarissa Calil Bonifacio
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported crown in fibula bone model.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Retrospective clinical study of ultrawide implants more than 6 mm in diameter.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Yang-Jin Yi; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08-05

10.  Morphology and Dimensions of Nasopalatine Canal: a Radiographic Analysis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Leila Khojastepour; Abdolaziz Haghnegahdar; Marzieh Keshtkar
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.