Literature DB >> 9393375

Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria--is investigation necessary?

P Froom1, J Froom, J Ribak.   

Abstract

Microscopic hematuria is common in asymptomatic adults, but the benefit of screening the general population for blood in the urine has not been established. On the other hand, most studies of referred patients with putatively asymptomatic microscopic hematuria have reported a 2-11% prevalence of urothelial malignancies, leading to the recommendation that all patients with microscopic hematuria be thoroughly investigated. Urinalysis is inexpensive and highly acceptable to the general population, but is neither a sensitive, nor specific test, and has poor predictive value for urothelial malignancies, and nephrological diseases. Furthermore the benefits of early detection of such diseases has not been established. We conclude that screening urinalysis cannot be recommended. Studies are needed to determine which constellation of findings primary physicians use to select patients for referral to centers with urological and nephrological expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9393375     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00124-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  2 in total

Review 1.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2.

Authors:  W S Smellie; J O Forth; C A M McNulty; L Hirschowitz; D Lilic; R Gosling; D Bareford; E Logan; K G Kerr; G P Spickett; J Hoffman; A Galloway; C A Bloxham
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Patients with new onset haematuria: assessing the discriminant value of clinical information in relation to urological malignancies.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton; Sara Mann; Alan S Rigby; Julie Ashley; Sarah Palmer; John W Hetherington
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.386

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.