Literature DB >> 9393279

Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery.

R D Macmillan1, A D Purushotham, E Mallon, J G Love, W D George.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery is associated with a short distant disease-free survival, particularly if it occurs early. Early recurrence is caused by residual disease left at the time of surgery. Previous studies have demonstrated that disease in the tumour bed is a common finding after breast-conserving surgery.
METHODS: The follow-up (mean 4.4 years) of 300 patients who had tumour bed analysis performed by the cavity shaving technique following breast-conserving surgery is presented. Postoperative radiotherapy was administered to all patients.
RESULTS: The incidence of tumour bed positivity was 39.3 per cent. With a selective re-excision policy the local recurrence rate was 2.0 per cent and distant recurrence rate 10.4 per cent. Multivariate analysis identified lymphovascular invasion, oestrogen receptor status and tumour bed status as independent predictors of time to distant recurrence.
CONCLUSION: A low rate of local recurrence can be achieved using this technique of margin assessment. Tumour bed status may be a useful prognostic factor following breast-conserving surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9393279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  4 in total

1.  Audit of local recurrence following breast conservation surgery with 5-mm target margin and hypofractionated 40-Gray breast radiotherapy for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Siong-Seng Liau; Massimiliano Cariati; David Noble; Charles Wilson; Gordon C Wishart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Guideline-concordant treatment predicts survival: a National Cancer Database validation study of novel composite locoregional and systemic treatment scores among women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Tina W F Yen; Zhuping Garacci; Purushottam W Laud; Liliana E Pezzin; Ann B Nattinger
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 3.  Cavity Shaving plus Lumpectomy versus Lumpectomy Alone for Patients with Breast Cancer Undergoing Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Yu Ren; Jianjun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.