Literature DB >> 9392932

Results of the Kentucky high school football knee injury survey.

B D Stocker1, J A Nyland, D N Caborn, R Sternes, J M Ray.   

Abstract

The study attempted to: 1) determine knee injury and reinjury incidence of Kentucky high school football players; 2) relate results to initial care provider, treatment following initial physician exam, time lost from injury, injury type, player position, and team size; and 3) assess coaches opinions and practices about lateral prophylactic knee brace (LPKB) usage and effectiveness. A post season, mail-in coaches' survey (50.2% return, 101/201) collected these data. Returned surveys represented 4690 players with average team size (x +/- SD) of 43 +/- 13. Two hundred fifty seven reported knee injuries yielded .055 knee injuries/player with .04 knee injuries/player being "new" and .015 knee injuries/player recurring (27% of reported knee injuries) during the season. Games accounted for 56.4% (56/101) of reported knee injuries. Coaches generally believed that LPKB usage prevented knee injuries (56.4%, 56/101) and allowed LPKB usage (92.1%, 93/101), however only 8.3% (8/101) required their wear (interior linemen 50%, linebackers 25%, entire team (25%). Interior linemen had the greatest number of knee injuries, followed by offensive backs and linebackers. Most knee injuries (81%, 208/257) were out 3-6 weeks or less, 64% (164/257) involved sprains or contusions, 38% (97/257) were treated surgically (alone or with rehabilitation) and 36% (92/257) were treated solely with rehabilitation. Total knee injury and reinjury incidence were under-estimated compared to existing reports. Improved injury recording methods, and post-symposia coaches evaluation are recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ky Med Assoc        ISSN: 0023-0294


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of prophylactic braces in the prevention of knee ligament injuries in collegiate football players.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Terry L Grindstaff; Shelley W Linens; Elizabeth Uczekaj; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Wii knee revisited: meniscal injury from 10-pin bowling.

Authors:  Sami M Almedghio; Odisseas Shablahidis; Winston Rennie; Robert U Ashford
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-06-03

Review 3.  Knee pain and mobility impairments: meniscal and articular cartilage lesions.

Authors:  David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Richard C Ritter; Michael J Axe
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET).

Authors:  Derya Celik; Murat Demirel; Gamze Kuş; Mehmet Erdil; Arzu Razak Özdinçler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The meniscus: review of basic principles with application to surgery and rehabilitation.

Authors:  T Brindle; J Nyland; D L Johnson
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Cost of injuries from a prospective cohort study of North Carolina high school athletes.

Authors:  S B Knowles; S W Marshall; T Miller; R Spicer; J M Bowling; D Loomis; R W Millikan; J Yang; F O Mueller
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.399

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.