Literature DB >> 9392805

Asystolic cardiac arrest during head-up tilt test: incidence and therapeutic implications.

D Lacroix1, C Kouakam, D Klug, L Guédon-Moreau, G Vaksmann, S Kacet, J Lekieffre.   

Abstract

Occasionally, the cardioinhibitory response may be profound during tilt induced syncope. Whether this response is associated with more severe symptoms or predicts a poor response to pharmacotherapy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to characterize patients with vasovagally mediated asystole occurring during head-up tilt test and to evaluate the respective interests of sequential pacing and beta-blockers to treat them. We performed 60 degree tilt testing in 179 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope (91 women and 88 men, age 36.6 +/- 20.1 years). Asystole was defined as a ventricular pause > 5 seconds. All patients with tilt induced asystole received therapy with either beta-blockers or sequential pacing, the efficacy of which was evaluated with serial tilt tests. Of 77 patients with positive tilt test, 10 developed syncope related to asystole (mean duration 11.9 +/- 4.9 s), 2 with spontaneous recovery, and 8 with seizures needing a brief cardiopulmonary resuscitation. When compared with patients without asystole, asystolic patients had more severe symptoms (seizures: 6/10 vs 9/67, P = 0.05, injury 9/10 vs 27/67, P = 0.0048). In the first six patients in whom cardiac pacing was considered, syncope or presyncope still occurred despite atrioventricular pacing at 45 beats/min. Five of these 6 patients, as well as the remaining 4 asystolic patients, were tilted with beta-blockers: 3 patients became tilt-negative; 3 were significantly improved; and 3 did not respond. During follow-up (mean 22.7 +/- 11.7 months) with every patient taking beta-blockers and seven having a permanent pacemaker, no syncopal recurrence was observed. Tilt-induced asystole that may require resuscitative maneuvers occurs especially in patients with a history of seizures or injury. Therapy with beta-blockers in often effective to prevent induction of syncope as well as recurrences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392805     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb05432.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac pacing in patients with familial dysautonomia--there is nothing simple about sudden death.

Authors:  Angelo Bartoletti
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  Inadequate sympathovagal balance in response to orthostatism in patients with unexplained syncope and a positive head up tilt test.

Authors:  C Kouakam; D Lacroix; N Zghal; R Logier; D Klug; P Le Franc; M Jarwe; S Kacet
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  The fainting patient: value of the head-upright tilt-table test in adult patients with orthostatic intolerance.

Authors:  M Lamarre-Cliche; J Cusson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Evaluation of syncope: an overview.

Authors:  A K Gupta; A Maheshwari; Y Lokhandwala
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2001-10-01

5.  The Current Indication for Pacemaker in Patients with Cardioinhibitory Vasovagal Syncope.

Authors:  Rose Mary Ferreira Lisboa da Silva
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2016-08-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.