Literature DB >> 9392716

Neutralizing ageism in critical care via outcomes research.

D J Mick1, M H Ackerman.   

Abstract

Ageism, as a mind-set, amplifies a belief that intensive care for the elderly is ineffectual. However, there are little data to support the notion that advanced chronological age alone predicts unfavorable outcomes in response to intensive care. A lack of outcome data, combined with ageism, may place older patients at risk for rationing of intensive care. Currently, neither public policy nor cultural norms directly support a limitation in services to the elderly. However, as pressure to reduce health care costs increases, critically ill elderly patients may be targeted for rationing. In this context, outcomes research involving elderly populations is crucial. The purpose of this report is to explicate the risk of ageism in the delivery of intensive care and to describe methods for implementing outcomes assessment for critically ill elderly patients as an essential element in a continuum of care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392716     DOI: 10.1097/00044067-199711000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AACN Clin Issues        ISSN: 1079-0713


  1 in total

1.  The ETHICA study (part II): simulation study of determinants and variability of ICU physician decisions in patients aged 80 or over.

Authors:  M Garrouste-Orgeas; A Tabah; A Vesin; F Philippart; A Kpodji; C Bruel; C Grégoire; A Max; J F Timsit; B Misset
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 17.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.