Literature DB >> 9392548

A phase I trial of hepatic arterial bromodeoxyuridine and conformal radiation therapy for patients with primary hepatobiliary cancers or colorectal liver metastases.

J M Robertson1, C J McGinn, S Walker, M V Marx, M L Kessler, W D Ensminger, T S Lawrence.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have previously found that conformal radiation therapy (RT) and hepatic arterial fluorodeoxyuridine was associated with durable responses and long-term survival for patients treated for nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary tumors and colorectal liver metastases. Further improvements in hepatic control may result from the addition of selective radiosensitization using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) infused through the hepatic artery (HA) concurrently with RT. This is a Phase I study of escalating doses of HA BrdU combined with our standard hepatic RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable primary hepatobiliary cancer or colorectal liver metastases were treated with concurrent HA BrdU and conformal RT (1.5 Gy per fraction, twice a day). Three-dimensional treatment planning was used to define both the target and normal liver volumes. The total dose of RT (24, 48, or 66 Gy) was determined by the fractional volume of normal liver excluded from the high dose volume. HA BrdU was escalated in standard Phase I fashion with at least three patients receiving each combination of RT dose and BrdU dose. The starting dose of HA BrdU was 10 mg/kg/day, with two potential escalations to a maximum of 25 mg/kg/day (the maximum tolerable dose of HA BrdU when given alone on this same schedule). Grade > or = 3 toxicity was considered dose limiting. Patients receiving 24 Gy had one cycle of HA BrdU, while those receiving either 48 or 66 Gy had two cycles. Patients were followed for toxicity, complications, and response (when evaluable).
RESULTS: A total of 41 patients (18 with colorectal liver metastases, 16 with cholangiocarcinoma and 7 with hepatoma) were treated. Five patients were removed from the protocol (three had HA catheter complications, one developed atrial fibrillation, and one was removed due to recurrent Grade 4 toxicity), although all five are included for toxicity purposes. Dose-limiting toxicity was primarily thrombocytopenia and there was no obvious relationship with the RT dose. Only 2 of 17 cycles given at 25 mg/kg/day had Grade > or = 3 toxicity. Complications developed in four patients, including one patient with radiation-induced liver disease. Response rates were not improved compared to our previous experience.
CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate dose of HA BrdU for Phase II evaluation is 25 mg/kg/day. Neither the hepatic parenchyma nor the gastrointestinal mucosa appeared to be sensitized by this method of BrdU administration. It is anticipated that these, or still newer methods of therapy, can improve treatment results in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392548     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00550-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

Review 1.  Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jianmin Xu; Xinyu Qin; Jianping Wang; Suzhan Zhang; Yunshi Zhong; Li Ren; Ye Wei; Shaochong Zeng; Deseng Wan; Shu Zheng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Ethynyldeoxyuridine (EdU) suppresses in vitro population expansion and in vivo tumor progression of human glioblastoma cells.

Authors:  Heather H Ross; Maryam Rahman; Lindsay H Levkoff; Sebastien Millette; Teresa Martin-Carreras; Erin M Dunbar; Brent A Reynolds; Eric D Laywell
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Application of Radiotherapeutic Strategies in the BCLC-Defined Stages of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Cha Jihye; Seong Jinsil
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 4.  Radiotherapy and chemotherapy as therapeutic strategies in extrahepatic biliary duct carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas B Brunner; Cynthia L Eccles
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Comparison between chemoembolization combined with radiotherapy and chemoembolization alone for large hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Jian Guo; Er-Xin Yu; Lu-Ming Liu; Jie Li; Zhen Chen; Jun-Hua Lin; Zhi-Qiang Meng; Yi Feng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Bromodeoxyuridine inhibits cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Lindsay H Levkoff; Gregory P Marshall; Heather H Ross; Maria Caldeira; Brent A Reynolds; Meryem Cakiroglu; Christopher L Mariani; Wolfgang J Streit; Eric D Laywell
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Dosimetric parameter predicting the deterioration of hepatic function after helical tomotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Seok Hyun Son; Chul Seung Kay; Jin Ho Song; Sea-Won Lee; Byung Ock Choi; Young Nam Kang; Jeong Won Jang; Seung Kew Yoon; Hong Seok Jang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Effect of Oral Supplementation with Branched-chain Amino Acid (BCAA) during Radiotherapy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Double-Blind Randomized Study.

Authors:  Ik Jae Lee; Jinsil Seong; Jung Im Bae; Sei Hwan You; Yumie Rhee; Jong Ho Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.679

9.  The optimal selection of radiotherapy treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ik Jae Lee; Jinsil Seong
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Feasibility of sorafenib combined with local radiotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jihye Cha; Jinsil Seong; Ik Jae Lee; Jun Won Kim; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.