Literature DB >> 9392465

Reduction of adverse events in MRI of the breast by personal patient care.

S Youssefzadeh1, K Eibenberger, T Helbich, R Dorffner, K Dantendorfer, M Breitenseher, G Wolf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the difference in anxiety reactions in patients undergoing standard (non-breast) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRM) and to evaluate the influence of patient information before the breast imaging examination on the rate of premature termination of the procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 2 years, 5837 non-breast and 336 breast magnetic resonance examinations were performed at our institution. One group of breast MRM patients (n = 144) received detailed information and a second group (n = 189) received only routine information before MRI. The rates of premature termination were recorded for all groups.
RESULTS: In 0.5% (27/5837) of patients undergoing standard MRI examinations the study had to be stopped prematurely. Of the breast MRM patients, those who had received only routine information had a significantly higher rate of premature termination when compared to the better-informed patients and those undergoing standard MRI (5.5%, 10/189, P= 0.01). A significantly lower rate of premature termination occurred in the better-informed breast group (0%, 0/144).
CONCLUSION: MRM is associated with an increase in patient anxiety and higher rates of incomplete examination than other MR procedures. We recommend careful patient preparation including detailed verbal information before MRM and support during the procedure to obtain optimal patient compliance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9392465     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80082-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  3 in total

1.  Patient perspectives on repeated MRI and PET/CT examinations during neoadjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lucas Goense; Alicia S Borggreve; Sophie E Heethuis; Astrid Lhmw van Lier; Richard van Hillegersberg; Stella Mook; Gert J Meijer; Peter S N van Rossum; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Preparing patients according to their individual coping style improves patient experience of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Janika E M Madl; Sarah C Sturmbauer; Rolf Janka; Susanne Bay; Nicolas Rohleder
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2022-09-08

3.  Preliminary observations regarding the expectations, acceptability and satisfaction of whole-body MRI in self-referring asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Derna Busacchio; Ketti Mazzocco; Sara Gandini; Paola Pricolo; Marianna Masiero; Paul Eugene Summers; Grabriella Pravettoni; Giuseppe Petralia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.039

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.