Literature DB >> 9391922

The effect of question structure on self-reports of heavy drinking: closed-ended versus open-ended questions.

F J Ivis1, S J Bondy, E M Adlaf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared open-ended versus closed-ended questions on the frequency of consuming five or more drinks in a single sitting.
METHOD: From a general population survey of Ontario adults (N = 2,022, 62% male), we analyzed a subsample of 649 respondents who reported drinking five or more drinks in a single sitting at least once in the past year. Differences in agreement between the two questions and rates of missing data were evaluated.
RESULTS: For the most part, the two measures were not consistent, with the closed-ended question eliciting higher rates of heavier drinking. Rates of missing data were also higher for the open-ended question.
CONCLUSIONS: Open-ended question may not necessarily be more suitable than closed-ended questions for estimating the frequency of heavy alcohol use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9391922     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  8 in total

1.  Validity Concerns with Multiplying Ordinal Items Defined by Binned Counts: An Application to a Quantity-Frequency Measure of Alcohol Use.

Authors:  James S McGinley; Patrick J Curran
Journal:  Methodology (Gott)       Date:  2014

2.  Patient-centered communication: do patients really prefer it?

Authors:  Sara L Swenson; Stephanie Buell; Patti Zettler; Martha White; Delaney C Ruston; Bernard Lo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Assessing Problematic Substance Use in HIV Care: Which Questions Elicit Accurate Patient Disclosures?

Authors:  Wynne Callon; Mary Catherine Beach; Somnath Saha; Geetanjali Chander; Ira B Wilson; Michael Barton Laws; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard Moore; P Todd Korthuis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Alcohol measurement methodology in epidemiology: recent advances and opportunities.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; William C Kerr
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Test-retest reliability and validity of life-course alcohol consumption measures: the 2005 National Alcohol Survey follow-up.

Authors:  Thomas K Greenfield; Madhabika B Nayak; Jason Bond; William C Kerr; Yu Ye
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Comparisons between context-specific and beverage-specific quantity frequency instruments to assess alcohol consumption indices: Individual and sample level analysis.

Authors:  Polathep Vichitkunakorn; Karnsunaphat Balthip; Alan Geater; Sawitri Assanangkornchai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Inconsistency in reporting abstention and heavy drinking frequency: associations with sex and socioeconomic status, and potential impacts.

Authors:  Robyn M Kydd; Jennie Connor
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.826

8.  Social Response to the Vaccine against COVID-19: The Underrated Power of Influence.

Authors:  Dimitra S Mouliou; Ioannis Pantazopoulos; Konstantinos I Gourgoulianis
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-12-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.