Literature DB >> 9390809

Cochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data.

L T Cohen1, P A Busby, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Results for forward masking and numerical estimation of pitch were compared in a group of 6 adult subjects implanted with cochlear prostheses manufactured by Cochlear Limited. Data were collected for bipolar + 1 stimulation in all subjects, and for stimulation in one other mode, either common ground or monopolar, for all subjects but one. The pitch data show various irregularities and in each case can be seen to be broadly consistent with the corresponding forward masking data. It is shown that a 'centre of gravity' of the forward masking distribution varies with masker electrode in a manner that is qualitatively very similar to the variation of pitch estimate. It is suggested that, while pitch estimation results are consistent with those from forward masking, the latter contain more detailed information that may be useful in understanding intersubject variations in speech comprehension.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9390809     DOI: 10.1159/000259211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  6 in total

1.  Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Johan Laneau; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-27

2.  Electrode interaction in pediatric cochlear implant subjects.

Authors:  Marc D Eisen; Kevin H Franck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

3.  Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Aniket A Saoji; David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement, and the partial tripolar configuration.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Steven M Bierer; Julie Arenberg Bierer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 6.  Procedural Factors That Affect Psychophysical Measures of Spatial Selectivity in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Stefano Cosentino; John M Deeks; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.