Literature DB >> 9389819

A report on 387 cases of microsurgical tubal reversals.

J D Kim1, K S Kim, J K Doo, C H Rhyeu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey what factors influence the pregnancy outcome in an effort to improve the pregnancy rate (PR) after microsurgical reversal of tubal sterilization.
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. PATIENT(S): Three hundred eighty-seven patients who had microsurgical tubal reversal between March 1982 and January 1994. INTERVENTION(S): Postoperative pregnancy outcomes were determined by telephone, letters, and direct interviews. RESULT(S): Pregnancy outcomes were identified in 94.1% of the total patients. The overall PR was 91.6%, of which 3.9% spontaneously aborted and 1.7% were ectopic. The probability that pregnancy occurred within the first 12 months was 0.80. The median interval from the tubal reversal to pregnancy was 5.34 months. The pregnancy success rate after reversal of Falope ring sterilization was statistically significantly higher than in the other groups. Patients with reversed tubal length > or = 7 cm had a statistically significantly higher PR than those with < 7 cm. CONCLUSION(S): The overall probability of pregnancy was 0.89. The tubal length reconstructed after tubal reversal and the type of sterilization performed previously were the important factors affecting the PR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9389819     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00339-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Surgical competence of obstetrics and gynecology residents performing microsurgical tubal anastamoses.

Authors:  John L Frattarelli; Steve Hong; Grant D E McWilliams
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Cost and efficacy comparison of in vitro fertilization and tubal anastomosis for women after tubal ligation.

Authors:  Lauren B Messinger; Connie E Alford; John M Csokmay; Melinda B Henne; Sunni L Mumford; James H Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Is surgical repair of the fallopian tubes ever appropriate?

Authors:  Ginter Sotrel
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

4.  Robot-assisted segmental resection of tubal pregnancy followed by end-to-end reanastomosis for preserving tubal patency and fertility: An initial report.

Authors:  Joo Hyun Park; SiHyun Cho; Young Sik Choi; Seok Kyo Seo; Byung Seok Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Laparoscopic Reversal of Tubal Sterilization; A Retrospective Study Over 135 Cases.

Authors:  Pierre Arnaud Godin; Konstantinos Syrios; Gwennaelle Rege; Sami Demir; Efstratia Charitidou; Olivier Wery
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-01-09

6.  Role of Reconstructive Microsurgery in Tubal Infertility in Young Women.

Authors:  Sorin Barac; Lucian Petru Jiga; Andreea Rata; Ioan Sas; Roxana Ramona Onofrei; Mihai Ionac
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.