Literature DB >> 9389235

Diurnal variation in stature: is stretching the answer?

L D Voss1, B J Bailey.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the extent and timing of diurnal variation in stature and to examine the effectiveness of the stretched technique in reducing the loss in height.
SETTING: A Southampton school.
DESIGN: Fifty three children, divided into two groups, were measured by two independent auxologists using a Leicester height measure. Each child was measured four times, at 0900, 1100, 1300, and 1500, using both an unstretched and a stretched technique. OUTCOME MEASURES: Height loss after each of the three time intervals for both unstretched and stretched modes.
RESULTS: There was a clear decrease in stature during the morning, but no further loss occurred after the subjects had been up for around six hours. The mean height losses for the unstretched (stretched) modes were 0.31 cm (0.34 cm) and 0.20 cm (0.23 cm) for the periods 0900 to 1100 and 1100 to 1300, respectively, but only 0.045 cm (-0.019 cm) from 1300 to 1500. Stretching did not reduce the effects of diurnal variation, but significantly affected the recorded height by an average of 0.28 cm. There was no significant difference in reproducibility using either technique (SD 0.30 cm stretched v 0.31 cm unstretched).
CONCLUSIONS: Diurnal variation in stature may substantially affect the reliability of height data and careful consideration should be given to the timing of repeat measurements. As most height loss occurs in the morning, afternoon clinic appointments would be preferable. The standard stretched technique does not appear to reduce diurnal variation, nor does it affect precision. Measurements made using an unstretched method are recommended to avoid interobserver differences, known to occur where different observers are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9389235      PMCID: PMC1717337          DOI: 10.1136/adc.77.4.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  9 in total

1.  Daily measurements of the heights of two children from June 1984 to May 1985.

Authors:  K Ashizawa; M Kawabata
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.533

2.  Diurnal variation in stature and sitting height in 12-14-year-old boys.

Authors:  R H Whitehouse; J M Tanner; M J Healy
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.533

3.  Further observations on diurnal variation in standing height.

Authors:  M Lampl
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.533

4.  Diurnal height variation in children.

Authors:  A L Strickland; R B Shearin
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Variations in height throughout the day.

Authors:  J M Buckler
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Equipping the community to measure children's height: the reliability of portable instruments.

Authors:  L D Voss; B J Bailey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  The reliability of height measurement (the Wessex Growth Study).

Authors:  L D Voss; B J Bailey; K Cumming; T J Wilkin; P R Betts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  A comparative study of two different methods of measuring stature and the velocity of growth in children and adults.

Authors:  J Thomsen; P Evald; V Skieller; A Björk
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The reliability of height and height velocity in the assessment of growth (the Wessex Growth Study)

Authors:  L D Voss; T J Wilkin; B J Bailey; P R Betts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.791

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Growth monitoring.

Authors:  D M Hall
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Calculation of corrected body height in idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of four methods.

Authors:  Marcin Tyrakowski; Tomasz Kotwicki; Jaroslaw Czubak; Kris Siemionow
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A position for administration of difficult spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Gholamreza Shabanian; Mitra Saadat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

4.  Predicted body weight relationships for protective ventilation - unisex proposals from pre-term through to adult.

Authors:  Dion C Martin; Glenn N Richards
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.317

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.