Literature DB >> 9388534

Failure of monochloroacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid administered in the drinking water to produce liver cancer in male F344/N rats.

A B DeAngelo1, F B Daniel, B M Most, G R Olson.   

Abstract

The chlorinated acetic acids monochloroacetic acid (MCA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) are found as chlorine disinfection by-products in finished drinking-water supplies. TCA has been demonstrated to be a mouse liver carcinogen. A chronic study in which male Fischer 344/N rats were exposed for 104 wk to TCA and MCA in the drinking water is described. Animals, 28 d old, were exposed to 0.05, 0.5, or 2 g/L MCA, or 0.05, 0.5, or 5 g/L TCA. The 2.0 g/L MCA was lowered in stages to 1 g/L when the animals began to exhibit signs of toxicity. A time-weighted mean daily MCA concentration (MDC) of 1.1 g/L was calculated over the 104-wk exposure period. Time-weighted mean daily doses (MDD) based upon measured water consumption were 3.5, 26.1, and 59.9 mg/kg/d for 0.05, 0.5, and 1.1 g/L MCA, respectively; TCA MDD were 3.6, 32.5, and 363.8 mg/kg/d. Nonneoplastic hepatic changes were for the most part spontaneous and age related. No evidence of hepatic neoplasia was found at any of the MCA or TCA doses. The incidence of neoplastic lesions at other sites was not enhanced over that in the control group. Drinking water concentrations of > or = 0.5 g/L MCA produced a moderate to severe toxicity as reflected by a depressed water consumption and growth rate. A no-observed-effects level (NOEL) for carcinogenicity of 0.5 g/L (26.1 mg/kg/d) MCA was calculated. TCA at drinking water levels as high as 5 g/L produced only minimal toxicity and growth inhibition and provided a NOEL of 364 mg/kg/d. Our results demonstrate that under the conditions of this bioassay, MCA and TCA were not tumorigenic in the male F344/N rat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9388534     DOI: 10.1080/00984109708984074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health        ISSN: 0098-4108


  6 in total

1.  The Contribution of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha to the Relationship Between Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics of Trichloroethylene.

Authors:  Hong Sik Yoo; Joseph A Cichocki; Sungkyoon Kim; Abhishek Venkatratnam; Yasuhiro Iwata; Oksana Kosyk; Wanda Bodnar; Stephen Sweet; Anthony Knap; Terry Wade; Jerry Campbell; Harvey J Clewell; Stepan B Melnyk; Weihsueh A Chiu; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Jeffrey M Peters; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Trichloroethylene: Mechanistic, epidemiologic and other supporting evidence of carcinogenic hazard.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu; Lawrence H Lash; Hans Kromhout; Johnni Hansen; Kathryn Z Guyton
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 4.  Drinking water disinfection byproducts: review and approach to toxicity evaluation.

Authors:  G A Boorman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Mode of action of liver tumor induction by trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroacetate and dichloroacetate.

Authors:  R J Bull
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  New Perspectives for Cancer Hazard Evaluation by the Report on Carcinogens: A Case Study Using Read-Across Methods in the Evaluation of Haloacetic Acids Found as Water Disinfection By-Products.

Authors:  Stanley T Atwood; Ruth M Lunn; Sanford C Garner; Gloria D Jahnke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.