Literature DB >> 9387833

Differential premolar extractions.

C L Steyn1, R J du Preez, A M Harris.   

Abstract

The primary object of this research project was to establish the amount of incisor retraction to be expected during full fixed mechanotherapy and to generate regression models that could provide more accurate prediction of each of the three most popular combinations of symmetrical premolar extractions, where extraoral anchorage would not be used. Pretreatment and posttreatment records of 73 cases that had their four first premolars extracted (group 44), 74 cases with four second premolar extractions (group 55), and 59 cases with upper first and lower second premolar extractions (group 45) were selected. All these cases were treated by one orthodontist, who used the same edgewise technique throughout. The results indicate that, on average, maxillary retraction in relation to the facial plane (N Po) differed only slightly between group 55 (mean 4.2 +/- 2.4 mm) and group 44 (mean 4.7 +/- 2.3 mm), with relatively more retraction for group 45 (mean 6.6 +/- 2.5 mm; p < 0.05). In contrast, the mandibular incisors were retracted slightly more in group 44 than in the other two groups (p < 0.05). The regression models that were developed could be useful as an additional tool to assist the practitioner in the selection of which teeth to extract for a particular case.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9387833     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70074-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Extraction of the lateral incisors to treat maxillary protrusion: quantitative evaluation of the stomatognathic functions.

Authors:  Yoshihito Ishihara; Shingo Kuroda; Kumi Sumiyoshi; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto; Takashi Yamashiro
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  A comparison of second premolar extraction and mini-implant total arch distalization with interproximal stripping.

Authors:  Min-Ho Jung
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Fábio Rogério Torres Maria; Roberto Bombonatti
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.750

4.  Factors predisposing to maxillary anchorage loss: a retrospective study of 1403 cases.

Authors:  Hong Su; Bing Han; Sa Li; Bin Na; Wen Ma; Tian-Min Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Compensation trends of the angulation of first molars: retrospective study of 1403 malocclusion cases.

Authors:  Hong Su; Bing Han; Sa Li; Bin Na; Wen Ma; Tian-Min Xu
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 6.344

6.  Attitudes of orthodontists and laypersons towards tooth extractions and additional anchorage devices.

Authors:  Chidsanu Changsiripun; Petchpailin Phusantisampan
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Comparison of treatment effects between four premolar extraction and total arch distalization using the modified C-palatal plate.

Authors:  Sung Youn Jo; Mohamed Bayome; Justyn Park; Hee Jin Lim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Seong Ho Han
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Morphological changes of the anterior alveolar bone due to retraction of anterior teeth: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Qiannan Sun; Wenhsuan Lu; Yunfan Zhang; Liying Peng; Si Chen; Bing Han
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.151

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.