Literature DB >> 9386868

Prognostic significance of estrogen receptors in 405 primary breast cancers: a comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical methods.

A Molino1, R Micciolo, M Turazza, F Bonetti, Q Piubello, A Corgnati, L Sperotto, E Recaldin, P Spagnolli, E Manfrin, A Bonetti, R Nortilli, A Tomezzoli, G P Pollini, S Modena, G L Cetto.   

Abstract

Over the last few years, estrogen receptor determination by means of immunohistochemistry has been extensively used. The aim of this study was to compare this technique with estrogen receptor determination by means of dextran-coated charcoal, and to evaluate whether one of the two methods is more predictive of prognosis. Estrogen receptors were determined by means of both the dextran-coated charcoal method and immunohistochemistry in 405 patients with primary breast cancer; age, pathological tumor size, nodal status, and progesteron receptors by dextran-coated charcoal method were also recorded. The disease-free and overall survival probabilities were estimated using the product-limit method; Cox's proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the prognostic role of estrogen receptors as determined by the two methods. There appears to be a close association between estrogen receptor determination by the two methods (81.5% of concordant results) and their prognostic role was similar, even when the patients were divided into different groups (on the basis of their estrogen receptor status) and adjustments for the effect of other prognostic variables were taken into account. Our study shows that the two methods can be used indifferently to evaluate estrogen receptor status as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9386868     DOI: 10.1023/a:1005769925670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Walter Schippinger; Peter Regitnig; Nadia Dandachi; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Thomas Bauernhofer; Hellmut Samonigg; Farid Moinfar
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Prognostic and predictive value of low estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  A Bouchard-Fortier; L Provencher; C Blanchette; C Diorio
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Favorable predictive value of thyroid autoimmunity in high aggressive breast cancer.

Authors:  E Fiore; E Giustarini; C Mammoli; F Fragomeni; D Campani; I Muller; A Pinchera; C Giani
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Prognostic and predictive parameters in breast pathology: a pathologist's primer.

Authors:  Kimberly H Allison
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Gene Expression Signatures and Immunohistochemical Subtypes Add Prognostic Value to Each Other in Breast Cancer Cohorts.

Authors:  Arian Lundberg; Linda S Lindström; J Chuck Harrell; Claudette Falato; Joseph W Carlson; Paul K Wright; Theodoros Foukakis; Charles M Perou; Kamila Czene; Jonas Bergh; Nicholas P Tobin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; H C Pan; C Taylor; Y C Wang; M Dowsett; J Ingle; R Peto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.