Literature DB >> 9386706

On-pump, beating-heart coronary artery operations in high-risk patients: an acceptable trade-off?

L P Perrault1, P Menasché, J Peynet, B Faris, A Bel, T de Chaumaray, C Gatecel, B Touchot, G Bloch, J M Moalic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current cardioplegic techniques do not consistently avoid myocardial ischemic damage in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Alternatively, revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass is not always technically feasible. We investigated whether an intermediary approach based on maintenance of a beating heart with cardiopulmonary bypass support but without aortic cross-clamping might be an acceptable trade-off.
METHODS: Thirty-seven consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (with an average of two grafts per patient) in a pump-supported, non-cross-clamped beating heart. Inclusion criteria were poor left ventricular function (18 patients; mean ejection fraction, 0.25), evolving myocardial ischemia or infarction (11 patients, 5 of whom were in cardiogenic shock), and advanced age (3 patients; mean age 79.5 years) with comorbidities. Results were assessed primarily on the basis of clinical outcome. In addition, measurements of plasma levels of markers of myocardial damage (troponin Ic) and systemic inflammation (interleukin-6, interleukin-10, elastase) were done in 9 patients before and after bypass. In 6 patients, right atrial biopsy specimens were taken before and after bypass and processed by Northern blotting for the expression of messenger ribonucleic acid coding for the cardioprotective heat-shock protein 70. These biologic data were compared with those from control patients who underwent warm cardioplegic arrest within the same time span.
RESULTS: There was one cardiac-related death (2.7%), one Q-wave myocardial infarction, and no strokes. Four other deaths occurred from noncardiac causes, yielding an overall mortality rate of 13.5%. Limitation of myocardial injury was demonstrated by the minimal increase in postoperative troponin Ic levels (3.3 +/- 1.0 micrograms/L versus 6.6 +/- 1.5 micrograms/L in controls; p < 0.05) and the finding that heat-shock protein 70 messenger ribonucleic acid levels (expressed as a percentage of an internal standard) were significantly increased after bypass compared with pre-bypass values (279% +/- 80% versus 97% +/- 21%; p < 0.05). In the control group (cardioplegia), end-arrest values of heat-shock protein 70 messenger ribonucleic acid were not significantly changed from baseline (148% +/- 49% versus 91% +/- 29%), a finding suggesting a defective adaptive response to surgical stress. Conversely, peak levels of inflammatory mediators were not significantly different between the two groups. The eight grafts to the left anterior descending coronary artery that were assessed angiographically, by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, or both methods were patent with satisfactory anastomoses.
CONCLUSIONS: In select high-risk patients, on-pump, beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting may be an acceptable trade-off between conventional cardioplegia and off-pump operations. It is still associated with the potentially detrimental effects of cardiopulmonary bypass but eliminates intraoperative global myocardial ischemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9386706     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00842-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  19 in total

1.  Combined coronary artery and abdominal aortic surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  R Ascione; G Iannelli; N Spampinato
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2000

2.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass. Mid-term results.

Authors:  A Amano; H Hirose; A Takahashi; N Nagano
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2001-01

3.  Optimal coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nishi; Taichi Sakaguchi; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yasushi Yoshikawa; Satsuki Fukushima; Daisuke Yoshioka; Tetsuya Saito; Koichi Toda; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 4.  [Coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes].

Authors:  Ardawan Julian Rastan; Holger Thiele; Gerhard Schuler; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Emergency off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for acute left main coronary artery dissection.

Authors:  M Capdeville; J H Lee
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2001

6.  Myocardial revascularization using on-pump beating heart among patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  Ahmad K Darwazah; Vivian Bader; Ismail Isleem; Khalil Helwa
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Enhanced intracellular heat shock protein 70 expression of leukocytes and serum interleukins release: comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Lin; Tung-Lin Yang; Gou-Jieng Hong; Chi-Yuan Li; Feng-Yen Lin; Chien-Sung Tsai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Intermittent on-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting-a safer option.

Authors:  Sushil Kumar Singh; Sarvesh Kumar; Ved Prakash; Vijayant Devenraj; Vivek Tewarson
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-27

9.  On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: early outcomes.

Authors:  Bilgehan Erkut; Ozgur Dag; Mehmet Ali Kaygin; Mutlu Senocak; Husnu Kamil Limandal; Umit Arslan; Adem Kiymaz; Ahmet Aydin; Nail Kahraman; Eyup Serhat Calik
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  On-pump beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: comparative study on early and long-term clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ho Jin Kim; You Na Oh; Min Ho Ju; Joon Bum Kim; Sung-Ho Jung; Cheol Hyun Chung; Jae Won Lee; Suk Jung Choo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.