Literature DB >> 9385913

Determination of left ventricular filling pressure by Doppler echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease: critical role of left ventricular systolic function.

K Yamamoto1, R A Nishimura, H P Chaliki, C P Appleton, D R Holmes, M M Redfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the usefulness of transthoracic Doppler measurements in detecting increased left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure in patients with coronary artery disease, specifically examining the influence of systolic function on the accuracy of these methods.
BACKGROUND: Studies that have correlated Doppler indexes with LV filling pressures primarily involved patients with LV systolic dysfunction. The reliability of Doppler indexes in estimating filling pressures in patients with coronary artery disease and preserved systolic function is unclear.
METHODS: Pulsed wave Doppler transmitral and pulmonary venous flow velocity curves and LV pressure were recorded in 83 patients with coronary artery disease.
RESULTS: Conventional Doppler indexes (deceleration time of mitral E wave velocity, ratio of peak mitral E to A wave velocities and pulmonary venous systolic fraction) correlated with LV filling pressure in patients with an ejection fraction (EF) < or = 50% but not in those with an EF > 50%. Previously published regression analysis for prediction of LV filling pressure was accurate in patients with an EF < or = 50% but not in those with an EF > 50%. The difference between flow duration with atrial contraction in the pulmonary veins and transmitral flow duration with atrial contraction correlated with LV filling pressure in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the early diastolic portion of the transmitral or pulmonary venous flow velocity curves can be used to predict LV filling pressures in patients with systolic dysfunction, but are inaccurate in patients with preserved systolic function. The combined analysis of both flow velocity curves at atrial contraction is a reliable, feasible predictor of increased LV filling pressure, irrespective of systolic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9385913     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00390-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  27 in total

Review 1.  A clinical approach to the assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by Doppler echocardiography: update 2003.

Authors:  S R Ommen; R A Nishimura
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Left atrial strain: a new parameter for assessment of left ventricular filling pressure.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Ferdinando Loiacono; Frank Lloyd Dini; Michael Henein; Sergio Mondillo
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Reduced ventricular flow propagation velocity in elite athletes is augmented with the resumption of exercise training.

Authors:  Louise H Naylor; Leonard F Arnolda; Jenny A Deague; David Playford; Antonio Maurogiovanni; Gerard O'Driscoll; Daniel J Green
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Re: Determination of left ventricular filling pressure by new echocardiographic methods in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Leo H B Baur
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Modern evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function using Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  Ruvin S Gabriel; Allan L Klein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Is E/E' reliable in patients with regional wall motion abnormalities to estimate left ventricular filling pressure?

Authors:  Hong-Seok Lim; Soo-Jin Kang; Jung-Hyun Choi; Sung-Gyun Ahn; Byoung-Joo Choi; So-Yeon Choi; Myeong-Ho Yoon; Gyo-Seung Hwang; Seung-Jea Tahk; Joon-Han Shin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Concomitant use of beta-1 adrenoreceptor blocker and norepinephrine in patients with septic shock. Reply to a letter to the authors.

Authors:  Martin Balik; Jan Rulisek; Pavel Leden; Michal Zakharchenko; Michal Otahal; Hana Bartakova; Josef Korinek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  New observations from MR velocity-encoded flow measurements concerning diastolic function in constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  Kerstin Bauner; A Horng; Ch Schmitz; M Reiser; A Huber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  The Role of Echocardiography in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: What Do We Want from Imaging?

Authors:  Masaru Obokata; Yogesh N V Reddy; Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 10.  Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction of the cardiac surgery patient; a point of view for the cardiac surgeon and cardio-anesthesiologist.

Authors:  Efstratios E Apostolakis; Nikolaos G Baikoussis; Haralabos Parissis; Stavros N Siminelakis; Georgios S Papadopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.