Literature DB >> 9385088

Historical controls and modern survival analysis.

N Keiding1.   

Abstract

Comparison of observed mortality with 'known,' 'background,' or 'standard' rates has taken place for several hundred years. With the developments of regression models for survival data, an increasing interest has arisen in individualizing the standardisation using covariates of each individual. Also, account sometimes needs to be taken of random variation in the standard group. Emphasizing uses of the Cox regression model, this paper surveys a number of critical choices and pitfalls in this area. The methods are illustrated by comparing survival of liver patients after transplantation with survival after conservative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9385088     DOI: 10.1007/bf00985254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  13 in total

1.  The method of expected number of deaths, 1786-1886-1986.

Authors:  N Keiding
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology.

Authors:  F EDERER; L M AXTELL; S J CUTLER
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1961-09

3.  A note on the calculation of expected survival, illustrated by the survival of liver transplant patients.

Authors:  B L Thomsen; N Keiding; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Efficacy of liver transplantation in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  B H Markus; E R Dickson; P M Grambsch; T R Fleming; V Mazzaferro; G B Klintmalm; R H Wiesner; D H Van Thiel; T E Starzl
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Simple parametric and nonparametric models for excess and relative mortality.

Authors:  P K Andersen; M Vaeth
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Calculating expected mortality.

Authors:  N Keiding; M Vaeth
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Adjusted survival curve estimation using covariates.

Authors:  R W Makuch
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1982

8.  Use of a prognostic index in evaluation of liver transplantation for primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  J Neuberger; D G Altman; E Christensen; N Tygstrup; R Williams
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Survival after liver transplantation of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis in the Nordic countries. Comparison with expected survival in another series of transplantations and in an international trial of medical treatment.

Authors:  S Keiding; B G Ericzon; S Eriksson; A Flatmark; K Höckerstedt; H Isoniemi; I Karlberg; N Keiding; R Olsson; K Samela
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Use of prognostic models for assessment of value of liver transplantation in primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  G J Bonsel; I J Klompmaker; F van't Veer; J D Habbema; M J Slooff
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing effects on long-term survival after early termination of randomized trials.

Authors:  Y Shen; T R Fleming
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Sample size considerations for historical control studies with survival outcomes.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.051

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.