Literature DB >> 9385073

Rapid genotyping of mutant mice using dried blood spots for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.

D B Campbell1, E J Hess.   

Abstract

Spontaneous neurologic mutations in the mouse provide powerful tools for the study of mammalian central nervous system development. The study of mouse neurologic mutants has led to a better understanding of the complex mechanisms involved in the development of the nervous system. Because few of these mutations have been identified, molecular probes distinguishing heterozygotes from homozygotes are generally unavailable. Further, most neurologic mouse mutants breed poorly as homozygotes, making it necessary to breed heterozygotes and select homozygous mutant progeny based on phenotype. The requirement for heterozygous breeding and the lack of molecular markers specific for the mutation have hampered developmental studies because the underlying neurologic perturbations occur before the mutant mice can be identified by phenotype. The recent identification and chromosomal assignment of simple sequence repeats (SSRs), repetitive sequences of DNA found at a high density throughout the mouse genome, provide the tools for mapping mutations in the mouse and for subsequent genotyping of potential mutants prior to phenotype onset. The SSRs are useful because these markers are polymorphic (for review see Weber, J.L., Human DNA polymorphisms based on length variations in simple-sequence tandem repeats. In: K.E. Davies and S.M. Tilghman (Eds.), Genetic and Physical Mapping. Genome Analysis, Vol. I, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY, 1990, pp. 159-181 [16]), that is, the size of the individual SSRs differs among strains of mice. Following polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of an SSR and separation of PCR products by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, one can easily visualize differences in the size of the PCR product between mouse strains. Many mutations in the mouse arose spontaneously on inbred strains and were subsequently backcrossed onto a different strain. After many generations of congenic backcrosses, the only DNA retained from the original mutant strain is composed of the mutant gene and closely linked regions. Thus, it is possible to cross the mutant strain to a different mouse strain and map the mutation by correlating mutant phenotype to SSRs the same size as the original mutant strain. We have mapped the tottering (tg), Purkinje cell degeneration (pcd), and nervous (nr) mutations using SSRs in backcrossed mouse strains. The SSRs distinguishing mutant from normal strains can then be used to genotype potential mutant pups before the onset of the mutant phenotype. The protocol described below can be adapted to almost any mutation congenically inbred for genotyping. Here we describe a method for selecting primers appropriate for genotyping potential mouse mutants and a rapid protocol for genotype screening. Even with SSRs distinguishing mutant from normal mice, genotyping several mice simultaneously can be a daunting task. This is primarily because the protocols available for preparing DNA for PCR amplification are time-consuming, requiring several purification steps including phenol extractions. Although kits are commercially available for DNA preparation without organic extractions, these kits tend to be expensive. The protocol described is a rapid, inexpensive method of determining the genotype of mice using PCR analysis of dried blood spots. The protocol only requires PCR primers distinguishing among alleles and is therefore ideal for the rapid identification of potential mutants for those mouse mutations which have been mapped using microsatellite markers. The DNA preparation protocol may also be used in rapid screening of potential transgenic mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9385073     DOI: 10.1016/s1385-299x(96)00019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Protoc        ISSN: 1385-299X


  4 in total

1.  Adverse effects of vapocoolant and topical anesthesia for tail biopsy of preweanling mice.

Authors:  Gillian C Braden; Angela K Brice; F Claire Hankenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Behavioral and activity assessment of laboratory mice (Mus musculus) after tail biopsy under isoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  F Claire Hankenson; Gillian C Braden-Weiss; Julie A Blendy
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Evaluation of tail biopsy collection in laboratory mice (Mus musculus): vertebral ossification, DNA quantity, and acute behavioral responses.

Authors:  F Claire Hankenson; Laura M Garzel; David D Fischer; Bonnie Nolan; Kurt D Hankenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase expression in tottering mouse Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Brandy E Fureman; Daniel B Campbell; Ellen J Hess
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.911

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.