Literature DB >> 9383868

Back injury and work loss. Biomechanical and psychosocial influences.

A K Burton1, E Erg.   

Abstract

The exponential increase in occupational low back pain disability is a problem that is not being addressed adequately in clinical practice. The notion of achieving primary control through ergonomic intervention, based on biomechanics principles, has so far been unhelpful. The traditional secondary prevention strategies of rest and return to restricted work duties are seemingly suboptimal. Biomechanics/ergonomic considerations may be related to the first onset of low back pain, but there is little evidence that secondary control based solely on these principles will influence the risk of recurrence or progression to chronic disability. More promising in this respect are programs that take account of the psychosocial influences surrounding disability. Work organizational issues are clearly important, but so also is the behavior of clinicians. The balance of the available evidence suggests that clinicians generally should adopt a proactive approach to rehabilitation by recommending, whenever possible, early return to normal rather than restricted duties as well as complementary psychosocial advice if the issue of chronic disability is to be successfully tackled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9383868     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199711010-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial factors at work in relation to low back pain and consequences of low back pain; a systematic, critical review of prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; S Lings; C Leboeuf-Yde; L Bakketeig
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Workers' assessments of manual lifting tasks: cognitive strategies and validation with respect to objective indices and musculoskeletal symptoms.

Authors:  Simon S Yeung; Ash Genaidy; James Deddens; P C Leung
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Differences among outcome measures in occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Sue A Ferguson; William S Marras; Deborah L Burr
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

4.  Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence.

Authors:  Patrick Loisel; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rowland Hazard; Robert Keller; Inger Scheel; Maurits van Tulder; Barbara Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

5.  Managing future Gulf War Syndromes: international lessons and new models of care.

Authors:  Charles C Engel; Kenneth C Hyams; Ken Scott
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Is lumbar discography a determinate of discogenic low back pain: provocative discography reconsidered.

Authors:  E J Carragee
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

7.  Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcus Schiltenwolf; Matthias Buchner; Bernhard Heindl; Johannes von Reumont; Annette Müller; Wolfgang Eich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Predicting the long term course of low back pain and its consequences for sickness absence and associated work disability.

Authors:  A Burdorf; J P Jansen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Occupational upper extremity conditions: a detailed analysis of work-related outcomes.

Authors:  Glenn Pransky; Katy Benjamin; Carolyn Hill-Fotouhi; Kenneth E Fletcher; Jay Himmelstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

10.  Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: an intervention mapping approach.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; David Cassidy; Ivan Steensta; Sophie Soklaridis; Eleanor Boyle; Stephanie Eng; Hamer Howard; Bains Bhupinder; Pierre Côté
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.