Literature DB >> 9383274

Unraveling the role of structure and density in determining vertebral bone strength.

J F Veenland1, T M Link, W Konermann, N Meier, J L Grashuis, E S Gelsema.   

Abstract

The strength of bone is determined not only by bone density but also by structure. Therefore, quantification of the structure in radiographs by texture parameters may result in a better prediction of fracture risk. Since in radiographs density and structure are strongly correlated, the predictive power of texture parameters should be corrected for the influence of BMD to determine the additional information conveyed by these parameters. In this study, we evaluated the predictive power of various texture parameters based on the Grey-Level Dependence Method and the Morphological Gradient Method. This study was performed on 67 vertebrae obtained from 20 male and 12 female human cadaver thoracolumbar spines. BMD and area of the vertebral body were determined from QCT images and texture parameters were derived from direct magnification (DIMA) radiographs. The fracture force, measured under conditions simulating the in vivo situation, was corrected with the area of the vertebra to yield the fracture stress (FS). Results of the study indicate that BMD correlates significantly with FS r = 0.82 (P < 0. 001, n = 24) and r = 0.94 (P < 0.001, n = 43) for female and male vertebrae, respectively. Correlation coefficients of the investigated texture parameters were as high as 0.80 (P < 0.001) and 0.67 (P < 0.001) for the female and male vertebrae, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that in female vertebrae, the addition of one texture parameter to BMD results in a better prediction of strength. The multiple correlation coefficient was 0. 87 (P < 0.001) in this case. In male vertebrae, BMD was the best predictor of fracture stress. These results suggest that texture parameters, as measured in magnification radiographs, can predict bone strength. Whereas in all cases BMD is the best single predictor of bone strength, for women texture parameters contain useful additional information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9383274     DOI: 10.1007/s002239900370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  11 in total

1.  Three-dimensional texture analysis of cancellous bone cores evaluated at clinical CT resolutions.

Authors:  Chad Showalter; Bradley D Clymer; Bradford Richmond; Kimerly Powell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Radiographic texture analysis in the characterization of trabecular patterns in periprosthetic osteolysis.

Authors:  Joel R Wilkie; Maryellen L Giger; Charles A Engh; Robert H Hopper; John M Martell
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Inter-sex differences in structural properties of aging femora: implications on differential bone fragility: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Danijela Djonic; Petar Milovanovic; Slobodan Nikolic; Miomira Ivovic; Jelena Marinkovic; Thomas Beck; Marija Djuric
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Changes of elastic constants and anisotropy patterns in trabecular bone during disuse-induced bone loss assessed by poroelastic ultrasound.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort-TE MRI of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Loss of BMP signaling through BMPR1A in osteoblasts leads to greater collagen cross-link maturation and material-level mechanical properties in mouse femoral trabecular compartments.

Authors:  Yanshuai Zhang; Erin Gatenby McNerny; Masahiko Terajima; Mekhala Raghavan; Genevieve Romanowicz; Zhanpeng Zhang; Honghao Zhang; Nobuhiro Kamiya; Margaret Tantillo; Peizhi Zhu; Gregory J Scott; Manas K Ray; Michelle Lynch; Peter X Ma; Michael D Morris; Mitsuo Yamauchi; David H Kohn; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Standard radiography: untapped potential in the assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk.

Authors:  Pasi Pulkkinen; Simo Saarakkala; Miika T Nieminen; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  The Founder's Lecture 2009: advances in imaging of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Thomas Marc Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Identification of hip fracture patients from radiographs using Fourier analysis of the trabecular structure: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jennifer S Gregory; Alison Stewart; Peter E Undrill; David M Reid; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.