Literature DB >> 9383136

Screening for psychiatric illness with a combined screening and diagnostic instrument.

M Valenstein1, G Dalack, F Blow, S Figueroa, C Standiford, A Douglass.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine 1) if the PRIME-MD, a two-step screening and diagnostic instrument for psychiatric disorders, increases diagnosis and intervention when actively implemented in a busy general medicine clinic, and 2) the type of staff support required to achieve sufficient implementation to realize gains in diagnosis and treatment.
DESIGN: We introduced the PRIME-MD into a large general medicine clinic with repeated rotation of four support conditions for implementation: (1) no support, (2) nonclinical staff support (NCSS), (3) nursing staff (RN) support, and (4) a written "Prompt" condition. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Patients (N = 2,263) attending a general medicine clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcome measures were (1) PRIME-MD questionnaire and interview use, (2) overall psychiatric diagnosis, (3) new psychiatric diagnosis, and (4) provider intervention for psychiatric conditions. The NCSS, RN support, and prompt conditions resulted in similar rates of questionnaire use but significantly different rates of structured interview use. The NCSS condition was associated with significant increases in new diagnosis, and the RN support and Prompt condition were associated with significant increases in new diagnosis and intervention compared with no support.
CONCLUSIONS: Nursing staff support resulted in sufficient PRIME-MD implementation to achieve gains in both new diagnosis and provider intervention compared with no support. These gains occurred in a busy primary care clinic with nonselected providers and customary visit lengths. This level of support should be achievable in most clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9383136      PMCID: PMC1497187          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.07141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  29 in total

1.  Screening for depression in primary care clinics: the CES-D and the BDI.

Authors:  J M Zich; C C Attkisson; T K Greenfield
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.210

2.  Recognition of depression and anxiety by primary physicians.

Authors:  L S Linn; J Yager
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.386

3.  An experiment to change detection and management of mental morbidity in primary care.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P S German; E A Skinner; M VonKorff; R W Turner; L E Klein; M L Teitelbaum; M Kramer; J D Burke; B J Burns
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Improving physicians' recognition and treatment of depression in general medical care. Results from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  K Magruder-Habib; W W Zung; J R Feussner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Depression in medical outpatients. Underrecognition and misdiagnosis.

Authors:  E J Pérez-Stable; J Miranda; R F Muñoz; Y W Ying
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-05

6.  Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey.

Authors:  W E Broadhead; D G Blazer; L K George; C K Tse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-11-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in a primary care practice.

Authors:  J E Barrett; J A Barrett; T E Oxman; P D Gerber
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1988-12

8.  Psychiatric disorders in primary care. Results of a follow-up study.

Authors:  L G Kessler; P D Cleary; J D Burke
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1985-06

9.  The functioning and well-being of depressed patients. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  K B Wells; A Stewart; R D Hays; M A Burnam; W Rogers; M Daniels; S Berry; S Greenfield; J Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Assessing depression in primary medical and psychiatric practices.

Authors:  H C Schulberg; M Saul; M McClelland; M Ganguli; W Christy; R Frank
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1985-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Do ultra-short screening instruments accurately detect depression in primary care? A pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; James C Coyne
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Symptomatic severity of PRIME-MD diagnosed episodes of panic and generalized anxiety disorder in primary care.

Authors:  Bruce L Rollman; Bea Herbeck Belnap; Sati Mazumdar; Fang Zhu; Kurt Kroenke; Herbert C Schulberg; M Katherine Shear
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Efficiency of a two-item pre-screen to reduce the burden of depression screening in pregnancy and postpartum: an IMPLICIT network study.

Authors:  Ian M Bennett; Andrew Coco; James C Coyne; Alex J Mitchell; James Nicholson; Ellen Johnson; Michael Horst; Stephen Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Screening for depression in primary care: will one or two items suffice?

Authors:  Verena Henkel; Roland Mergl; James C Coyne; Ralf Kohnen; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Ulrich Hegerl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Delivering perinatal depression care in a rural obstetric setting: a mixed methods study of feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness.

Authors:  Amritha Bhat; Susan Reed; Johnny Mao; Mindy Vredevoogd; Joan Russo; Jennifer Unger; Roger Rowles; Jürgen Unützer
Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.949

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.