Literature DB >> 9382389

Process-based measures of quality: the need for detailed clinical data in large health care databases.

R H Palmer1.   

Abstract

The Institute of Medicine defines health care quality as increasing "the likelihood of desired health outcomes" using "services ... consistent with current professional knowledge." This definition implies that quality measures can be based on either achieving health care outcomes or completing processes that experts agree have been shown by scientific evidence to improve outcomes. Process-based measures are especially suitable when the user needs to know how to improve quality, when provider comparisons show equivalent outcomes but all providers should improve processes, when measures are needed to evaluate health care that is intended to improve long-term outcomes, or when the contribution of individual providers (especially providers who have a small number of cases) needs to be defined. However, many different process-based measures are needed to comprehensively assess quality, and many process-based measures require detailed clinical data currently found only in medical records. Therefore, the expense of abstracting records is a barrier to process-based measurement. Fortunately, large-scale process-based measures are becoming more feasible because the required clinical data are being included in large databases. The merging of existing inpatient and outpatient databases with pharmacy and laboratory databases is an important step toward obtaining data that link all patient admissions, appointments, diagnostic procedures, and prescriptions with diagnoses and test results. Other data that are valuable for process-based measures must still be obtained by abstracting data from records, including clinical findings, patient preferences, and medical and family history. In the future, such data may be added to large databases to create computerized medical records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9382389     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  16 in total

1.  Use of a hospital practice management system to provide initial data for a pediatric immunization registry.

Authors:  R A Jenders; B Dasgupta; D Mercedes; F Fries; K Stambaugh
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M Marshall
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

3.  Factors that influence line managers' perceptions of hospital performance data.

Authors:  Liane Soberman Ginsburg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Comparison of indicators assessing the quality of drug prescribing for asthma.

Authors:  C C Veninga; P Denig; L G Pont; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and coding accuracy from the perspective of quality measurement.

Authors:  Pavani Rangachari
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2007-04-16

7.  Does hospital performance on process measures directly measure high quality care or is it a marker of unmeasured care?

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Eric T Bradlow; David A Asch
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care.

Authors:  Charis Wei Ling Ng; Kok Ping Ng
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an electronic health record to create indicators of function: proof of concept using the SF-12.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Lise Poissant; Sara Ahmed; Lois Finch; Johanne Higgins; Nancy M Salbach; Judith Soicher; Susan Jaglal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-08-06       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  Do deficits in cardiac care influence high mortality rates in schizophrenia? A systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Oliver Lord
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.