Literature DB >> 9382388

Measuring and reporting managed care performance: lessons learned and new initiatives.

R K Spoeri1, R Ullman.   

Abstract

Performance measurement has become increasingly popular in the health care delivery system of the United States. Until recently, the hospital was the most commonly scrutinized setting. With the expansion of managed care and the resulting compilation of large administrative databases, interest in performance measurement beyond the hospital setting has increased considerably. In particular, the performance of health maintenance organizations is now being assessed and reported publicly. The performance of individual physicians is also garnering considerable attention. This paper summarizes some of the many developments in performance measurement in managed care. The Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS) is described in the context of the national Report Card Pilot Project and with respect to local report card projects emerging around the United States. The lessons learned are identified, particularly with respect to external auditing of HEDIS data. Finally, the new initiatives of physician profiling and outcomes reporting are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9382388     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  9 in total

1.  The development of a survey instrument for community health improvement.

Authors:  D A Bazos; W B Weeks; E S Fisher; H A DeBlois; E Hamilton; M J Young
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Does affiliation of physician groups with one another produce higher quality primary care?

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Kathryn L Coltin; Steven D Pearson; Ken P Kleinman; Jie Zheng; Janice A Singer; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Patient satisfaction with health care: critical outcome or trivial pursuit?

Authors:  R Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Quality of Diabetes Care Among Recent Immigrants to the USA.

Authors:  Romik Srivastava; Kinfe G Bishu; Rebekah J Walker; Joni Strom Williams; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-11-14

5.  Surgeons' economic profiles: can we get the "right" answers?

Authors:  Eric L Eisenstein; Charles F Bethea; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Marie Davidian; Eric D Peterson; Judith A Stafford; Daniel B Mark
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Measuring clinical performance: comparison and validity of telephone survey and administrative data.

Authors:  B L Thompson; P O'Connor; R Boyle; M Hindmarsh; N Salem; K W Simmons; E Wagner; J Oswald; S M Smith
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Association between angina and treatment satisfaction after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mary E Plomondon; David J Magid; Frederick A Masoudi; Philip G Jones; Lisa C Barry; Edward Havranek; Eric D Peterson; Harlan M Krumholz; John A Spertus; John S Rumsfeld
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effect of part-time practice on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Patricia H Parkerton; Edward H Wagner; Dean G Smith; Hugh L Straley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Validity of performance indicators for assessing prescribing quality: the case of asthma.

Authors:  Lisa G Pont; Petra Denig; Thys van der Molen; Willem Jan van der Veen; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11-18       Impact factor: 2.953

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.