Literature DB >> 9382210

[Interscalene brachial plexus catheter for anesthesia and postoperative pain therapy. Experience with a modified technique].

G Meier1, C Bauereis, C Heinrich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate a modified technique of interskalene brachial plexus anaesthesia (ISB) and postoperative catheter analgesia for shoulder surgery. The original method described by Winnie bears some rare but life-threatening complications (inadvertent subarachnoid or intra-arterial injection, pneumothorax).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-one patients with chronic rheumatoid arthritis who were scheduled for open or closed shoulder surgery received a modified ISB with catheter insertion. The injection site was more cephalad than that described by Winnie and the cannula was directed towards the junction between the medial and lateral third of the clavicle. Intra- and postoperative management, complications, and patients' satisfaction were recorded and evaluated.
RESULTS: Implementation of ISB was possible in all cases, however, 3% of these presented technical problems. Anaesthesia with 300 mg mepivacaine 1% was successful in 94% of patients without and in 96% with augmentation after an average of 32 min; 10% of the patients suffered a drop in blood pressure after being placed in the beach-chair position for surgery. Postoperatively, all patients received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% for pain management via the catheter; 11% needed an additional analgesic drug. The catheter was removed after an average of 5 days. Signs of superficial local infection were noticed in 8 cases. Side effects occurred in 13% as Horner's syndrome, in 6.5% as recurrent laryngeal nerve block, and in 3.3% as phrenic nerve block. The acceptance of this anaesthetic technique among the patients was very high (96.7%).
CONCLUSION: We consider the modified ISB with catheter a safe and effective procedure for anaesthesia and postoperative pain management of open and closed shoulder surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9382210     DOI: 10.1007/s001010050458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  16 in total

1.  [Brachial plexus. Anesthesia and analgesia].

Authors:  S Schulz-Stübner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Complications of peripheral regional anesthesia].

Authors:  M Neuburger; J Büttner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  [Intrathecal misplacement of an interscalene plexus catheter].

Authors:  M Walter; P Rogalla; C Spies; W J Kox; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  A supraomohyoidal plexus block designed to avoid complications.

Authors:  G Feigl; A Fuchs; M Gries; Q H Hogan; B Weninger; W Rosmarin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  [Epidural malpositioning of an interscalene plexus catheter].

Authors:  P Gaus; B Heb; Z Tanyay; H Müller-Breitenlohner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2011-07-03       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  [Cave: interscalene catheters].

Authors:  P Gaus; Ph Kutz; J A Bachtler; R Lindner; P Saur
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  [Regional anesthesia: tradition and innovation].

Authors:  U Schwemmer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  [Cost minimization analysis in postoperative pain management : economic efficiency and effectiveness of two infusion pump systems].

Authors:  A-K Bräscher; J Blunk; S Söhle; R E Feldmann; M Bauer; J Benrath
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  [Training methods for regional anaesthesia. Evaluation and comparison].

Authors:  G Feigl; F Anderhuber; G Schwarz; C Dorn; Jhd Fasel; R Likar
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  [Peripheral regional anesthesia in patients under general anesthesia: risk assessment with respect to parasthesia, injection pain and nerve damage].

Authors:  P Kessler; T Steinfeldt; W Gogarten; U Schwemmer; J Büttner; B M Graf; T Volk
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.