Literature DB >> 9381340

Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer. A prospective multicenter clinical trial.

M L Druart1, R Van Hee, J Etienne, G B Cadière, J F Gigot, M Legrand, J M Limbosch, B Navez, M Tugilimana, E Van Vyve, L Vereecken, E Wibin, J P Yvergneaux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A series of 100 consecutive patients with perforated peptic ulcer were prospectively evaluated in a multicenter study. The feasibility of the laparoscopic repair was evaluated.
METHODS: All patients had peritonitis, 20% were in septic shock, and 57% had delayed perforation. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in eight patients. The morbidity rate was 9% and mortality rate 5%.
RESULTS: The mean delay of postoperative gastric aspiration (mean 3.4 days) and resumed food intake (mean 4.4 days) as well as the mean postoperative hospital stay (mean 9.3 days) were comparable to conventional surgery, but postoperative comfort was subjectively increased by laparoscopy and noticed by all laparoscopic surgeons participating in this study.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer proves to be technically feasable and carries an acceptable morbidity and mortality rate, compared with conventional surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9381340     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  44 in total

1.  Laparoscopic closure of perforated duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  M Khoursheed; M Fuad; H Safar; H Dashti; A Behbehani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic treatment of gastroduodenal perforations: comparison with conventional surgery.

Authors:  B Kirshtein; M Bayme; T Mayer; L Lantsberg; E Avinoach; S Mizrahi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the"three-stitch" Graham patch technique.

Authors:  P W F Lam; M C S Lam; E K L Hui; Y W Sun; F P T Mok
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic biopsy: a simple detection method for Helicobacter pylori in perforated gastroduodenal ulcer patients undergoing laparoscopic repair.

Authors:  Kuo-Feng Hsu; Chung-Bao Hsieh; Ming-Lang Shih
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Risk factors influencing morbidity and mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  İlhan Taş; Burak Veli Ülger; Akın Önder; Murat Kapan; Zübeyir Bozdağ
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-10-20

6.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications.

Authors:  Markus K Muller; Simon Wrann; Jeannette Widmer; Jennifer Klasen; Markus Weber; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Non-trauma Emergency Pancreatoduodenectomies: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Michael F Nentwich; M Reeh; F G Uzunoglu; K Bachmann; M Bockhorn; J R Izbicki; Y K Vashist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.