Literature DB >> 9381321

CT-anatomy of the nasolacrimal sac and duct.

R Groell1, G J Schaffler, M Uggowitzer, D H Szolar, K Muellner.   

Abstract

Recent developments in ophthalmology such as balloon dilatation, stent implantation, laser therapy and endoscopy of the lacrimal drainage system raise the need for a detailed anatomical knowledge of this system. In this study morphometric measurements of the lacrimal drainage system were performed with thin-section axial computed tomography (CT) examinations in 147 patients with no signs of pathology related to the lacrimal drainage system. The mean length of the nasolacrimal duct measured 11.2 +/- 2.6 mm (range: 6-21 mm), the narrowest diameter was 3.7 +/- 0.7 mm (range: 2-7 mm). The mean length of the nasolacrimal sac was 11.8 +/- 2.5 mm (range: 6-18 mm). The width of the nasolacrimal sac did not exceed 4 mm unless filled with air. In 43 (29.3%) of the subjects air was visible within the nasolacrimal sac or duct. The knowledge of the morphometry of the lacrimal drainage system enables the ophthalmologist to plan intervention on the lacrimal drainage system precisely and avoid unnecessary manipulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9381321     DOI: 10.1007/bf01627974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  10 in total

1.  Investigating the effects of inferior turbinate outfracture on the lacrimal system by evaluating the results of paranasal sinus computed tomography and nasolacrimal irrigation test.

Authors:  Oğuzhan Dikici; Hafize Gökben Ulutaş; Gülçin Kazaz Dikici
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Morphometric differences in normal bony nasolacrimal anatomy: comparison between four ethnic groups.

Authors:  Zhiheng Lin; Namita Kamath; Adeela Malik
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal efferent lacrimal pathways.

Authors:  Peter C Brugger; Michael Weber; Daniela Prayer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Meet the Lacrimal Sac: Endoscopic Surgeons' Road Map.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Tyagi; Mary Kurien; Aparna Irodi; Ajoy M Varghese; Sunil J Holla; Regi Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-04-08

5.  Nasolacrimal system aeration on computed tomographic imaging: effects of patient positioning and scan orientation.

Authors:  Craig N Czyz; Thomas S Bacon; Andrew W Stacey; Eva N Cahill; Bryan R Costin; Boris I Karanfilov; Kenneth V Cahill
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-11

6.  Minimally invasive medial maxillectomy and the position of nasolacrimal duct: the CT study.

Authors:  Andrzej Sieskiewicz; Krzysztof Buczko; Jacek Janica; Adam Lukasiewicz; Urszula Lebkowska; Bartosz Piszczatowski; Ewa Olszewska
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Bony nasolacrimal duct size and outcomes of nasolacrimal silicone intubation for incomplete primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Min Kyu Yang; Ho-Seok Sa; Namju Kim; Jeong Hun Kim; Hokyung Choung; Sang In Khwarg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Diagnostic imaging of the nasolacrimal drainage system. Part I. Radiological anatomy of lacrimal pathways. Physiology of tear secretion and tear outflow.

Authors:  Artur Maliborski; Radosław Różycki
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-04-17

9.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Bony Nasolacrimal Canal by Automated Segmentation of Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Lucia Jañez-Garcia; Federico Saenz-Frances; Jose M Ramirez-Sebastian; Nicolas Toledano-Fernandez; Maria Urbasos-Pascual; Luis Jañez-Escalada
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Morphometric Evaluation of Bony Nasolacrimal Canal in a Caucasian Population with Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: A Multidetector Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Erdogan Bulbul; Alper Yazici; Bahar Yanik; Hasmet Yazici; Gulen Demirpolat
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.