Literature DB >> 9378830

The comparative effect of acidified sodium chlorite and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on plaque regrowth and salivary bacterial counts.

R Yates1, J Moran, M Addy, P J Mullan, W G Wade, R Newcombe.   

Abstract

Acidified sodium chlorite (ASC) is recognised as a highly potent, broad spectrum antimicrobial system that has been successfully developed for uses in veterinary, food processing and medical device fields. The current studies aimed to investigate the persistence of antimicrobial action and plaque inhibitory properties of 3 ASC mouthrinses by comparison with positive control, chlorhexidine 0.12%, and placebo control, water, rinses. Both studies were randomised, double-blind, cross-over 5-cell designs balanced for carryover. The 1st study involved 15 healthy subjects who immediately before and at 30, 60, 180, 300 and 420 min after rinsing provided 2 ml saliva samples. The samples were immediately processed for total anaerobic bacterial counts recorded after 96 h incubation. Washout periods were a minimum of 3 days. The second study involved 20 healthy subjects who on day 1 of each study were rendered plaque free, suspended normal oral hygiene methods and commenced rinsing twice daily with the allocated rinse. On day 5, plaque was scored by index and area after disclosing with erythrosin. Washout periods were 2 1/2 days. The 3 ASC and chlorhexidine rinses produced similar reductions in salivary bacterial counts which remained significantly below the placebo control to 7 h. There were no significant differences between ASC and chlorhexidine rinses except at 30 and 60 min when significantly greater reductions were produced by 2 ASC rinses compared to the chlorhexidine rinse. Plaque indices and areas were considerably and significantly lower with the ASC and chlorhexidine rinses compared to the placebo rinse. There were no significant differences between plaque scores for the 3 ASC rinses and the chlorhexidine rinse, although for 2 ASC rinses plaque scores were lower than for the chlorhexidine rinse. The results indicate that the 3 ASC rinses have equivalent plaque inhibitory action to chlorhexidine as a rinse. Similar to chlorhexidine, the plaque inhibitory action of the rinses appears to be derived from a persistence of antimicrobial action in the mouth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9378830     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00236.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  9 in total

1.  In vivo substantivity of 0.12% and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthrinses on salivary bacteria.

Authors:  Maria Consuelo Cousido; Inmaculada Tomás Carmona; Lucia García-Caballero; Jacobo Limeres; Maximiliano Alvarez; Pedro Diz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparing the effects of chlorhexidine and persica on alveolar bone healing following tooth extraction in rats, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Shokufeh Shahrabi; Alireza Navabazam
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of the effects of 0.05% sodium hypochlorite and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate twice daily rinse on periodontal parameters and gingival crevicular fluid HSV1 and CMV levels in patients with chronic periodontitis: a multicentric study.

Authors:  Sangeeta Singh; Parul Sharma; Mahadevan Kumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-10-24

4.  Effectiveness of mouthrinses and oral prophylaxis on reduction of microorganisms count in irreversible hydrocolloid impression: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Dolanchanpa Dasgupta; Saibal Kumar Sen; Soumitra Ghosh; Jayanta Bhattacharyya; Preeti Goel
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-12-07

5.  Effects of a mouthwash with chlorine dioxide on oral malodor and salivary bacteria: a randomized placebo-controlled 7-day trial.

Authors:  Kayoko Shinada; Masayuki Ueno; Chisato Konishi; Sachiko Takehara; Sayaka Yokoyama; Takashi Zaitsu; Mari Ohnuki; Fredrick Allan Clive Wright; Yoko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Effect of Aloe vera, chlorine dioxide, and chlorhexidine mouth rinses on plaque and gingivitis: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sravan Kumar Yeturu; Shashidhar Acharya; Arun Sreenivas Urala; Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-09-11

7.  Inhibition of Tongue Coat and Dental Plaque Formation by Stabilized Chlorine Dioxide Vs Chlorhexidine Mouthrinse: A Randomized, Triple Blinded Study.

Authors:  Seema Roodmal Yadav; Vineet Vaman Kini; Ashvini Padhye
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

8.  Rhamnolipids and surfactin inhibit the growth or formation of oral bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  Ryota Yamasaki; Aki Kawano; Yoshie Yoshioka; Wataru Ariyoshi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  A randomized double blind crossover placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the effects of a mouthwash containing chlorine dioxide on oral malodor.

Authors:  Kayoko Shinada; Masayuki Ueno; Chisato Konishi; Sachiko Takehara; Sayaka Yokoyama; Yoko Kawaguchi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.