AIMS: To date, the risk relating to the handling or allografting of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected postmortem skin remains hypothetical. While blood screening for HIV antibodies is still the key safety procedure to detect HIV infected cadavers, false negative results are a concern. Conversely, false positive results may hamper the collection of skin allografts. Accordingly, viral culture was used to clarify skin infectivity and the nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to assess the reliability of skin PCR testing. METHODS: Viral culture and nested PCR performed with gag and pol specific primers were investigated in cadaveric skin and blood from 12 HIV-1 infected patients. Samples were collected repeatedly between one and five days in seven patients. In most cases, analyses were performed on triplicate skin samples: fresh (n = 26); cryopreserved in 5% dimethylsulphoxide (n = 21), or cryopreserved in 30% glycerol (n = 26). RESULTS: HIV was isolated in two of 26 cultures of fresh skin specimens (8%), seven of 47 cryopreserved skin specimens (15%), and eight of 26 blood specimens (31%). The nested PCR detected HIV-1 in all skin samples (n = 73), regardless of the postmortem interval or cryopreservation. In blood, a positive signal was found in eight of 12 patients but two of them had discordant results on successive samples. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that nested PCR on postmortem skin samples can detect HIV more reliably than on blood. They also demonstrate the potential viral infectivity of fresh or stored skin postmortem samples in HIV infected patients. They underscore the need for caution during the handling of skin tissue from HIV infected cadavers and confirm the potential risk related to accidental allografting of HIV contaminated skin.
AIMS: To date, the risk relating to the handling or allografting of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infected postmortem skin remains hypothetical. While blood screening for HIV antibodies is still the key safety procedure to detect HIV infected cadavers, false negative results are a concern. Conversely, false positive results may hamper the collection of skin allografts. Accordingly, viral culture was used to clarify skin infectivity and the nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to assess the reliability of skin PCR testing. METHODS: Viral culture and nested PCR performed with gag and pol specific primers were investigated in cadaveric skin and blood from 12 HIV-1 infectedpatients. Samples were collected repeatedly between one and five days in seven patients. In most cases, analyses were performed on triplicate skin samples: fresh (n = 26); cryopreserved in 5% dimethylsulphoxide (n = 21), or cryopreserved in 30% glycerol (n = 26). RESULTS: HIV was isolated in two of 26 cultures of fresh skin specimens (8%), seven of 47 cryopreserved skin specimens (15%), and eight of 26 blood specimens (31%). The nested PCR detected HIV-1 in all skin samples (n = 73), regardless of the postmortem interval or cryopreservation. In blood, a positive signal was found in eight of 12 patients but two of them had discordant results on successive samples. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that nested PCR on postmortem skin samples can detect HIV more reliably than on blood. They also demonstrate the potential viral infectivity of fresh or stored skin postmortem samples in HIV infectedpatients. They underscore the need for caution during the handling of skin tissue from HIV infected cadavers and confirm the potential risk related to accidental allografting of HIV contaminated skin.
Authors: P Williams; P Simmonds; P L Yap; P Balfe; J Bishop; R Brettle; R Hague; D Hargreaves; J Inglis; A L Brown Journal: AIDS Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: R J Simonds; S D Holmberg; R L Hurwitz; T R Coleman; S Bottenfield; L J Conley; S H Kohlenberg; K G Castro; B A Dahan; C A Schable Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-03-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J W Jama; L J Launer; J C Witteman; J H den Breeijen; M M Breteler; D E Grobbee; A Hofman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1996-08-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: M J Bankowski; A L Landay; B Staes; R Shuburg; M Kritzler; V Hajakian; H Kessler Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: T M Folks; D Powell; M Lightfoote; S Koenig; A S Fauci; S Benn; A Rabson; D Daugherty; H E Gendelman; M D Hoggan Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1986-07-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: J Nyagol; G De Falco; S Lazzi; A Luzzi; G Cerino; S Shaheen; N Palummo; C Bellan; D Spina; L Leoncini Journal: J Hematop Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 0.196