Literature DB >> 9377160

X-ray crystallography and NMR reveal complementary views of structure and dynamics.

A T Brünger1.   

Abstract

X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy are not competing techniques, but rather they complement each other. Taken together they can provide an atomic detail picture of macromolecular structure and dynamics which can be used to obtain an understanding of life processes at the molecular level.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1997        PMID： 9377160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Biol        ISSN： 1072-8368


  19 in total

1.  A stochastic algorithm for global optimization and for best populations: a test case of side chains in proteins.

Authors:  Meir Glick; Anwar Rayan; Amiram Goldblum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Comparison of multiple crystal structures with NMR data for engrailed homeodomain.

Authors:  Tomasz L Religa
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Insights into equilibrium dynamics of proteins from comparison of NMR and X-ray data with computational predictions.

Authors:  Lee-Wei Yang; Eran Eyal; Chakra Chennubhotla; JunGoo Jee; Angela M Gronenborn; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  An assignment of intrinsically disordered regions of proteins based on NMR structures.

Authors:  Motonori Ota; Ryotaro Koike; Takayuki Amemiya; Takeshi Tenno; Pedro R Romero; Hidekazu Hiroaki; A Keith Dunker; Satoshi Fukuchi
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Integrated description of protein dynamics from room-temperature X-ray crystallography and NMR.

Authors:  R Bryn Fenwick; Henry van den Bedem; James S Fraser; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ligand and receptor dynamics contribute to the mechanism of graded PPARγ agonism.

Authors:  Travis S Hughes; Michael J Chalmers; Scott Novick; Dana S Kuruvilla; Mi Ra Chang; Theodore M Kamenecka; Mark Rance; Bruce A Johnson; Thomas P Burris; Patrick R Griffin; Douglas J Kojetin
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Characterizing highly dynamic conformational states: The transcription bubble in RNAP-promoter open complex as an example.

Authors:  Eitan Lerner; Antonino Ingargiola; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Structures of m-iodo Hoechst-DNA complexes in crystals with reduced solvent content: implications for minor groove binder drug design.

Authors:  C J Squire; L J Baker; G R Clark; R F Martin; J White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Solution NMR refinement of a metal ion bound protein using metal ion inclusive restrained molecular dynamics methods.

Authors:  Dhruva K Chakravorty; Bing Wang; Chul Won Lee; Alfredo J Guerra; David P Giedroc; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 10.  Toward dynamic structural biology: Two decades of single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer.

Authors:  Eitan Lerner; Thorben Cordes; Antonino Ingargiola; Yazan Alhadid; SangYoon Chung; Xavier Michalet; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.