Literature DB >> 9376639

The induction of Fos-like proteins in the suprachiasmatic nuclei and intergeniculate leaflet by light pulses in degus (Octodon degus) and rats.

K Krajnak1, L Dickenson, T M Lee.   

Abstract

In nocturnal rodents, exposure to light results in an increase in Fos expression in two regions that receive direct retinal input: the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) of the hypothalamus and the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) of the thalamus. The induction of Fos within the SCN of nocturnal rodents is phase dependent, with light presented during the subjective night increasing Fos expression and light presented during the subjective day having little effect. By contrast, Fos expression increases in the IGL when light is presented during the subjective day or night. It is unclear whether Fos is part of the pathway mediating light-induced phase shifts in diurnal rodents. In the present study, the ability of light to induce immunostaining for Fos in the SCN and IGL was compared in diurnal rodents, Octodon degus (degus), and nocturnal rats. Degus and rats were either maintained in constant darkness or exposed to a 1-h light pulse at circadian time (CT) 4 or 16. Degus exhibit robust phase shifts at each of those circadian hours, whereas rats demonstrate phase shifts only at CT 16. In degus, exposure to a 1-h light pulse at CT 16 resulted in an increase in the number of Fos-immunopositive (Fos+) cells in the ventrolateral SCN. By contrast, a 1-h light pulse at CT 4 resulted in a decrease in the number of Fos+ cells in the dorsomedial portion of the SCN. In rats, a light pulse presented at CT 16 resulted in an increase in Fos+ cells throughout the SCN, and a pulse at CT 4 had no effect on Fos staining. Both degus and rats showed increases in Fos expression in the IGL after light exposure at CTs 4 and 16. The authors conclude that light pulses presented at times that produce phase shifts in activity rhythms also alter Fos expression in the SCN and IGL of degus. Although these effects of light exposure on Fos expression are not identical in diurnal and nocturnal rodents, it is likely that Fos and other immediate early genes are part of the pathway mediating the effects of light in both diurnal and nocturnal rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9376639     DOI: 10.1177/074873049701200502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  7 in total

1.  Juvenile emotional experience alters synaptic composition in the rodent cortex, hippocampus, and lateral amygdala.

Authors:  Gerd Poeggel; Carina Helmeke; Andreas Abraham; Tina Schwabe; Patricia Friedrich; Katharina Braun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The response of Per1 to light in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the diurnal degu (Octodon degus).

Authors:  Jessica M Koch; Megan H Hagenauer; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Acute effects of light on the brain and behavior of diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus and nocturnal Mus musculus.

Authors:  Dorela D Shuboni; Shannon L Cramm; Lily Yan; Chidambaram Ramanathan; Breyanna L Cavanaugh; Antonio A Nunez; Laura Smale
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  The substructure of the suprachiasmatic nucleus: Similarities between nocturnal and diurnal spiny mice.

Authors:  Rotem Cohen; Noga Kronfeld-Schor; Chidambaram Ramanathan; Anna Baumgras; Laura Smale
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Period gene expression in the diurnal degu (Octodon degus) differs from the nocturnal laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Andrew M Vosko; Megan H Hagenauer; Daniel L Hummer; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Light color importance for circadian entrainment in a diurnal (Octodon degus) and a nocturnal (Rattus norvegicus) rodent.

Authors:  Maria Angeles Bonmati-Carrion; Beatriz Baño-Otalora; Juan Antonio Madrid; Maria Angeles Rol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A comparative analysis of the distribution of immunoreactive orexin A and B in the brains of nocturnal and diurnal rodents.

Authors:  Joshua P Nixon; Laura Smale
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 3.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.