Literature DB >> 9376004

An analysis of neonatal morbidity and mortality in maternal (in utero) and neonatal transports at 24-34 weeks' gestation.

P A Shlossman1, J S Manley, A C Sciscione, G H Colmorgen.   

Abstract

Sophisticated neonatal transport has improved the safety of transporting preterm infants, but may not substitute for the benefits of in utero transport. To describe gestational age trends and assess differences in complications between maternal (in utero) and neonatal transports, we analyzed maternal and neonatal transports, over 3 years, to the only tertiary center in the region. Those who delivered between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation were included in the analysis. Gestational age trends for each complication are described, showing, in general, decreasing morbidity with gestational age in both groups. These trends were usually parallel, but not equal. A significantly greater mean neonatal intensive care unit (p = 0.003) and total length of stay (p = 0.006) as well as longer ventilator time (p = 0.01) and oxygen therapy exposure (p = 0.018) were noted in those transported neonatally. The incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (p < 0.001), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (p = 0.027), intraventricular hemorrhage (p = 0.041), intraventricular hemorrhage grades III and IV (p = 0.008), patent ductus arteriosus (p = 0.032), and mortality (p = 0.001) were all significantly greater among the neonatal transports. The differences were not significant for retinopathy of prematurity, hyperbilirubinemia, necrotizing enterocolitis, periventricular leukomalacia, and culture proven sepsis. Specialized neonatal transport and advanced neonatology techniques have not removed the significant advantage of decreased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital intervention resulting from maternal (in utero) transport.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9376004     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  18 in total

1.  The differential impact of delivery hospital on the outcomes of premature infants.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Michael Baiocchi; Corinne E Ahlberg; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Moving the preterm infant.

Authors:  Peter W Fowlie; Philip Booth; Charles H Skeoch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-16

Review 3.  The regionalization of pediatric health care.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Sage Myers; Brendan Carr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Trends in centralization of very preterm deliveries and neonatal survival in Finland in 1987-2017.

Authors:  Kjell Helenius; Mika Gissler; Liisa Lehtonen
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-07

5.  Long-distance air transport of an infant weighing less than 500 g: Is it in the patient's best interest?

Authors:  Oliver Karam; Michel Roy; Keith Barrington; Annie Janvier
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Regionalization of neonatal care: benefits, barriers, and beyond.

Authors:  Sara C Handley; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Neonatal Mortality After Interhospital Transfer of Pregnant Women for Imminent Very Preterm Birth in Illinois.

Authors:  Kshama P Shah; Raye-Ann O deRegnier; William A Grobman; Amanda C Bennett
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 8.  United States and territory policies supporting maternal and neonatal transfer: review of transport and reimbursement.

Authors:  E M Okoroh; C D Kroelinger; S M Lasswell; D A Goodman; A M Williams; W D Barfield
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Impact of managed clinical networks on NHS specialist neonatal services in England: population based study.

Authors:  C Gale; S Santhakumaran; S Nagarajan; Y Statnikov; N Modi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-04-03

Review 10.  Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants.

Authors:  Sherry E Courtney; David J Durand; Jeanette M Asselin; Eric C Eichenwald; Ann R Stark
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.