Literature DB >> 9375529

Mesothelioma in Quebec chrysotile miners and millers: epidemiology and aetiology.

A D McDonald1, B W Case, A Churg, A Dufresne, G W Gibbs, P Sébastien, J C McDonald.   

Abstract

In a cohort of some 11,000 men born 1891-1920 and employed in the Quebec chrysotile production industry, including a small asbestos products factory, of 9780 men who survived into 1936, 8009 are known to have died before 1993, 38 probably from mesothelioma--33 in miners and millers and five in factory workers. Among the 5041 miners and millers at Thetford Mines, there had been 4125 deaths from all causes, including 25 (0.61%) from mesothelioma, a rate of 33.7 per 100,000 subject-years; the corresponding figures for the 4031 men at Asbestos were eight out of 3331 (0.24%, or 13.2 per 100,000 subject-years). At the factory in Asbestos, where all 708 employees were potentially exposed to crocidolite and/or amosite, there were 553 deaths, of which five (0.90%) were due to mesothelioma; the rate of 46.2 per 100,000 subject-years was 3.5 times higher than among the local miners and millers. Six of the 33 cases in miners and millers were in men employed from 2 to 5 years and who might have been exposed to asbestos elsewhere; otherwise, the 22 cases at Thetford were in men employed 20 years or more and the five at Asbestos for at least 30 years. The cases at Thetford were more common in miners than in millers, whereas those at. Asbestos were all in millers. Within Thetford Mines, case-referent analyses showed a substantially increased risk associated with years of employment in a circumscribed group of five mines (Area A), but not in a peripherally distributed group of ten mines (Area B); nor was the risk related to years employed at Asbestos, either at the mine and mill or at the factory. There was no indication that risks were affected by the level of dust exposure. A similar pattern in the prevalence of pleural calcification had been observed at Thetford Mines in the 1970s. These geographical differences, both within the Thetford region and between it and Asbestos, suggest that the explanation is mineralogical. Lung tissue analyses showed that the concentration of tremolite fibres was much higher in Area A than in Area B, a finding compatible with geological knowledge of the region. These findings, probably related to the far greater biopersistence of amphibole fibres than chrysotile, have important implications in the control of asbestos related disease and for wider aspects of fibre toxicology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9375529     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4878(97)00020-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  14 in total

Review 1.  A ban on asbestos must be based on a comparative risk assessment.

Authors:  M Camus
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Evaluation of exposure to the airborne asbestos in an asbestos cement sheet manufacturing industry in Iran.

Authors:  Davood Panahi; Hossein Kakooei; Hossein Marioryad; Ramin Mehrdad; Mohammad Golhosseini
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Mineralogical and exposure determinants of pulmonary fibrosis among Québec chrysotile miners and millers.

Authors:  Ataollah Nayebzadeh; Bruce W Case; Janick Massé; André Dufresne
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Health risk of chrysotile revisited.

Authors:  David Bernstein; Jacques Dunnigan; Thomas Hesterberg; Robert Brown; Juan Antonio Legaspi Velasco; Raúl Barrera; John Hoskins; Allen Gibbs
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Mortality in a cohort of vermiculite miners exposed to fibrous amphibole in Libby, Montana.

Authors:  J C McDonald; J Harris; B Armstrong
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 6.  Applying definitions of "asbestos" to environmental and "low-dose" exposure levels and health effects, particularly malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  B W Case; J L Abraham; G Meeker; F D Pooley; K E Pinkerton
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 7.  Nonpulmonary outcomes of asbestos exposure.

Authors:  Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Jean C Pfau; Robert Crouch; Andrij Holian
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

8.  Estimating the asbestos-related lung cancer burden from mesothelioma mortality.

Authors:  V McCormack; J Peto; G Byrnes; K Straif; P Boffetta
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparative hazards of chrysotile asbestos and its substitutes: A European perspective.

Authors:  P T Harrison; L S Levy; G Patrick; G H Pigott; L L Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The European mesothelioma epidemic.

Authors:  J Peto; A Decarli; C La Vecchia; F Levi; E Negri
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.