Literature DB >> 9375388

Sexual reinforcement in the female rat.

T J Matthews1, M Grigore, L Tang, M Doat, L M Kow, D W Pfaff.   

Abstract

Sexual reinforcement in the female rat was studied in a preparation that allowed continuous operant responding for access to a male rat leading to intromission. Experiment 1 used a high operant level nose-poke response to test the possible reinforcing effects of some components of access to a male. A simple tone stimulus used as a conditioned reinforcer and two odor stimuli, target male bedding and emulsified preputial gland, were tested. None of these contingent events altered responding above or below operant level. Access to the male, which was always accompanied by intromission, immediately increased response rate when it was made contingent upon the nose-poke response. Performance on fixed-ratio schedules was erratic, and response rate was low in comparison to typical food-reinforced responding. An interresponse-time analysis indicated, however, that some effect of the ratio contingency may have been present. In Experiment 2, several modifications of the procedure were tested with the objective of creating a more tractable preparation for behavior analysis. Response type and the hormone delivery method were changed, and 2 target males were used instead of 1. The latter tripled the average number of reinforcers earned in a single session. Differences between sexual and other reinforcers are discussed in terms of procedural, quantitative, and motivational aspects of the sexual reinforcement procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9375388      PMCID: PMC1284640          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF INTERRESPONSE TIMES DURING VI AND VR REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  W KINTSCH
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  RESPONSES OF RATS TO SEX ODORS.

Authors:  W J CARR; L S LOEB; M L DISSINGER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-06

3.  Differential reward value of incomplete and complete sexual behavior.

Authors:  J KAGAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1955-02

4.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

5.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Sexual preference in female rats during estrous cycle, pregnancy and lactation.

Authors:  M Eliasson; B J Meyerson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-06

7.  Film analyses of lordosis in female rats.

Authors:  D W Pfaff; C Lewis
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 3.587

8.  Operant investigation of mating preference in female rats.

Authors:  D French; D Fitzpatrick; O T Law
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-11

9.  The effects of long-term estrogen exposure on the induction of sexual behavior and measurements of brain estrogen and progestin receptors in the female rat.

Authors:  B Parsons; N J MacLusky; M S Krieger; B S McEwen; D W Pfaff
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Techniques for establishing schedules with wheel running as reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  I H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  3 in total

1.  Use of an operant paradigm for the study of antidepressant-induced sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Lynda Uphouse; Jonathan Pinkston; Duane Baade; Christian Solano; Bless Onaiwu
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 2.  Membrane estrogen receptor signaling impacts the reward circuitry of the female brain to influence motivated behaviors.

Authors:  Katherine R Tonn Eisinger; Erin B Larson; Marissa I Boulware; Mark J Thomas; Paul G Mermelstein
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  A cooperative function for multisensory stimuli in the induction of approach behavior of a potential mate.

Authors:  Anders Ågmo; Eelke M S Snoeren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.