Literature DB >> 9374889

Patients' views on their discharge from follow up in outpatient clinics: qualitative study.

Y Burkey1, M Black, H Reeve.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To discover the views of patients about their discharge from outpatient clinics, to detect any change in these perceptions over time, and explore how the discharge process might be improved for the patient.
DESIGN: A qualitative study comprising in-depth or semistructured interviews with patients 2 weeks and 3 months after discharge from an outpatient clinic.
SUBJECTS: 45 patients who had attended outpatient clinics on three or more occasions.
SETTING: Five general medical outpatient clinics from a Manchester provider trust. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aspects of the discharge consultation valued by patients included confidence that the doctor knew and understood their case; clarity of the discharge process; an explanation of the reasons for discharge; information about treatment, future care, and the mechanism for re-referral; and being seen by doctors who sought their views and allowed time for questions and reflection.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' views about their discharge changed over time and varied in relation to several factors, which included patients' perceptions of the discharge process, patients' expectations, the way in which the outpatient clinics were organised, and patients' relationships with, and confidence in, their general practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9374889      PMCID: PMC2127739          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7116.1138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  10 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities for informatics to improve discharge planning: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Rhonda Renee Archie; Suzanne Austin Boren
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

2.  Consultants could give patients a letter summarising their consultation.

Authors:  C Essex
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-28

3.  Establishing an integrated gastroenterology service between a medical center and the community.

Authors:  Yaron Niv; Ram Dickman; Zohar Levi; Gadi Neumann; Dorit Ehrlich; Haim Bitterman; Jacob Dreiher; Arnon Cohen; Doron Comaneshter; Eyran Halpern
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Management continuity from the patient perspective: comparison of primary healthcare evaluation instruments.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Frederick Burge; Raynald Pineault; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Fatima Bouharaoui; Christine Beaulieu; Darcy A Santor; Jean-Frédéric Lévesque
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-12

5.  Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple clinicians: a qualitative metasummary.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Danièle Roberge; George K Freeman; Christine Beaulieu
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  Patients' perspectives on the medical primary-secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Rod Sampson; Jamie Cooper; Rosaline Barbour; Rob Polson; Philip Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Understanding clinician influences and patient perspectives on outpatient discharge decisions: a qualitative study.

Authors:  N A Harun; A Y Finlay; V Piguet; S Salek
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Transition from specialist to primary diabetes care: a qualitative study of perspectives of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Sharon Brez; Margo Rowan; Janine Malcolm; Sheryl Izzi; Julie Maranger; Clare Liddy; Erin Keely; Teik Chye Ooi
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Can we see more outpatients without more doctors?

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Stephen J Leslie; Gordon K McInnes; Kathleen McCormac; Norman R Peden
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Transition of care: experiences and preferences of patients across the primary/secondary interface - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Annette J Berendsen; G Majella de Jong; Betty Meyboom-de Jong; Janny H Dekker; Jan Schuling
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.