Literature DB >> 9374275

Antidromic and orthodromic responses by subicular neurons in rat brain slices.

M Stewart1.   

Abstract

The subiculum forms part of the region of transition between hippocampus and entorhinal cortex and is one of the primary output structures of the hippocampal formation. Intracellular recordings from subicular bursting and non-bursting cell types and field potential recordings were taken in horizontal slices from rat brains. The inputs and outputs of the two cell types were studied for the purpose of reinforcing or refuting the dichotomy proposed on the basis of membrane properties. Some bursting cells were antidromically activated by stimuli applied to the superficial or deep layers of presubiculum, but never by stimuli applied to deep layers of medial entorhinal cortex (dMEC). Some non-bursting subicular neurons were antidromically activated by stimuli applied to dMEC, but never by stimuli applied to presubiculum. Antidromic population events in subiculum were single spikes when deep MEC was stimulated, but were bursts when presubiculum was stimulated, even in the presence of glutamate receptor antagonists. Population bursts consist of 2 or more population spikes with peak to peak intervals of approximately 5 ms. That population bursts occur in slices where excitatory transmission is blocked suggests that such population bursts reflect coincident bursts by individual neurons. Short-latency (< 5 ms) excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were evoked in both subicular cell types in response to single entorhinal, presubicular and CA1 stimuli. Long-latency (> 10 ms) EPSPs were seen in both cell types in response to presubicular, but not entorhinal or CA1 stimulation. Bursting cells responded to brief trains of orthodromic stimuli (2-10 pulses, 5-10 ms interstimulus interval) with a burst of action potentials even when the cell was previously depolarized out of bursting range by current injection. Non-bursting cells responded to brief trains of orthodromic stimuli with repetitive firing (< or = 1 spike/stimulus) at all holding potentials. Spike intervals could reach those seen in bursts by bursting cells. It is concluded that: (1) the distinction between bursting and non-bursting subicular neurons is a dichotomy and cells do not change their identity when activated antidromically or orthodromically; (2) the outputs of the two cell types may be different: bursting cells projected to presubiculum and non-bursting cells projected to entorhinal cortex; and (3) non-bursting cells can, when repetitively stimulated, fire repetitive spikes with interspike intervals in the range of intervals seen in bursts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9374275     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00690-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  10 in total

1.  Control of bursting by local inhibition in the rat subiculum in vitro.

Authors:  L Menendez de la Prida
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Different levels of Ih determine distinct temporal integration in bursting and regular-spiking neurons in rat subiculum.

Authors:  Ingrid van Welie; Michiel W H Remme; Johannes A van Hooft; Wytse J Wadman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Two different forms of long-term potentiation at CA1-subiculum synapses.

Authors:  Christian Wozny; Nikolaus Maier; Dietmar Schmitz; Joachim Behr
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Intrinsic connectivity of the rat subiculum: I. Dendritic morphology and patterns of axonal arborization by pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  E Harris; M P Witter; G Weinstein; M Stewart
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-07-09       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Intrinsic connectivity of the rat subiculum: II. Properties of synchronous spontaneous activity and a demonstration of multiple generator regions.

Authors:  E Harris; M Stewart
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2001-07-09       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Target-specific output patterns are predicted by the distribution of regular-spiking and bursting pyramidal neurons in the subiculum.

Authors:  Yujin Kim; Nelson Spruston
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Retrosplenial and subicular inputs converge on superficially projecting layer V neurons of medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Øyvind Wilsgård Simonsen; Rafał Czajkowski; Menno P Witter
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.748

8.  Cell type-specific separation of subicular principal neurons during network activities.

Authors:  Joanna Eller; Shota Zarnadze; Peter Bäuerle; Tamar Dugladze; Tengis Gloveli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Noncanonical, Dopamine-Dependent Long-Term Potentiation at Hippocampal Output Synapses in a Rodent Model of First-Episode Psychosis.

Authors:  Julia C Bartsch; Joachim Behr
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Group II metabotropic glutamate receptors depress synaptic transmission onto subicular burst firing neurons.

Authors:  Michael Kintscher; Jörg Breustedt; Stéphanie Miceli; Dietmar Schmitz; Christian Wozny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.